2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa813b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-based Parallax Confirmed by Spitzer: Binary Microlensing Event MOA-2015-BLG-020

Abstract: We present the analysis of the binary gravitational microlensing event MOA-2015-BLG-020. The event has a fairly long timescale (∼63 days) and thus the light curve deviates significantly from the lensing model that is based on the rectilinear lens-source relative motion. This enables us to measure the microlensing parallax through the annual parallax effect. The microlensing parallax parameters constrained by the ground-based data are confirmed by the Spitzer observations through the satellite parallax method. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Spitzer has helped to measure θ E and π E for a dozen stellar binaries (e.g. Bozza et al 2016;Han et al 2017;Wang et al 2017) and planets (e.g. Udalski et al 2015b;Street et al 2016;Shvartzvald et al 2017;Ryu et al 2018), disentangling the absolute physical properties of the lens systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Spitzer has helped to measure θ E and π E for a dozen stellar binaries (e.g. Bozza et al 2016;Han et al 2017;Wang et al 2017) and planets (e.g. Udalski et al 2015b;Street et al 2016;Shvartzvald et al 2017;Ryu et al 2018), disentangling the absolute physical properties of the lens systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the angular radius derived from asteroseismic analysis and from traditional CMD analysis also enables us to test the empirical CSB relation of M giants. Usually, the CSB relation from Kervella et al (2004b) is used in microlensing analyses to estimate the source angular radius (e.g., Wang et al 2017;Mróz et al 2018;OGLE Collaboration et al 2019). Using this method, we derived an angular radius of 32.4 ± 1.9 µas, ∼ 2σ away from that from asteroseismic analysis.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the event provides a test bed in which one can check the consistency of the π E values and compare the precision of π E measurements by the individual methods. We note that there exist four cases for which ground-based π E measurements have been confirmed by space-based data: OGLE-2014-BLG-0124 , OGLE-2015-BLG-0196 (Han et al 2017), OGLE-2016-BLG-0168 (Shin et al 2017), and MOA-2015-BLG-020 (Wang et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%