2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground arthropod communities in paddy fields during the dry period: Comparison between different farming methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), we tested whether the compressor factor or background dB level caused differences in the Bray–Curtis or Cao dissimilarity matrices calculated from abundance data at the family and genus levels (program R, CRAN package: VEGAN). Families or genera that only occurred at one site were excluded from PERMANOVA analyses (Ohwaki, ), and for the Bray–Curtis analyses the abundance data were square‐root‐transformed to reduce leverage by dominant taxa (program R, CRAN package: VEGAN; Davies et al., ). Finally, nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was used to visualize the relationships of the sites with one another using the full datasets and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), we tested whether the compressor factor or background dB level caused differences in the Bray–Curtis or Cao dissimilarity matrices calculated from abundance data at the family and genus levels (program R, CRAN package: VEGAN). Families or genera that only occurred at one site were excluded from PERMANOVA analyses (Ohwaki, ), and for the Bray–Curtis analyses the abundance data were square‐root‐transformed to reduce leverage by dominant taxa (program R, CRAN package: VEGAN; Davies et al., ). Finally, nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was used to visualize the relationships of the sites with one another using the full datasets and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%