Abstract:We consider a dilute, homogeneous Bose gas at positive temperature. The system is investigated in the Gross-Pitaevskii limit, where the scattering length a is so small that the interaction energy is of the same order of magnitude as the spectral gap of the Laplacian, and for temperatures that are comparable to the critical temperature of the ideal gas. We show that the difference between the specific free energy of the interacting system and the one of the ideal gas is to leading order given by 4πa 2̺ 2 − ̺ 2 … Show more
“…Although a universal behavior can still be expected at the phase transition, the phase diagram depends on w at leading order and a mathematical treatment seems out of reach with the present techniques. A simpler behavior is however expected in the dilute regime ρ → 0 with ρ ∼ T d/2 (Gross-Pitaevskii regime [48]). In dimension d = 3 and at our macroscopic scale, the Gross-Pitaevskii limit corresponds to replacing λw by λw λ with w λ (x) = λ −3 w(x/λ) in our many-particle Hamiltonian.…”
Section: (B8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dimension d = 3 and at our macroscopic scale, the Gross-Pitaevskii limit corresponds to replacing λw by λw λ with w λ (x) = λ −3 w(x/λ) in our many-particle Hamiltonian. In this case one would expect the phase transition to be described by the (appropriately renormalized) nonlinear Gibbs measure µ over the torus T 3 , with w replaced by the Dirac delta 8πaδ 0 where a is the scattering length of w [115,114,48]. Proving such a result seems a formidable task.…”
Section: (B8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other rigorous mathematical works on the Bose gas taking temperature into account include [17,144,145,147,167,49,48]. In particular, the rigorous derivation of the Bose-Einstein phase transition in interacting Bose gases still seems way out of reach, except for special lattice models [114,Chapter 11] and for the trapped case in the Gross-Pitaevskii limit which was recently solved by Deuchert-Seiringer-Yngvason [49,48]. To our knowledge, the only mathematical works devoted to the study of the behavior close to the Bose-Einstein phase transition are [103,107,60,154,62] for equilibrium states and [61] in the one-dimensional dynamical case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is actually a difference of two quantities which are individually infinite µ 0almost surely. Estimates on relative one-particle density matrices related to (3.9) are recently obtained in [49,48], but in a different setting, without divergences.…”
“…Although a universal behavior can still be expected at the phase transition, the phase diagram depends on w at leading order and a mathematical treatment seems out of reach with the present techniques. A simpler behavior is however expected in the dilute regime ρ → 0 with ρ ∼ T d/2 (Gross-Pitaevskii regime [48]). In dimension d = 3 and at our macroscopic scale, the Gross-Pitaevskii limit corresponds to replacing λw by λw λ with w λ (x) = λ −3 w(x/λ) in our many-particle Hamiltonian.…”
Section: (B8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dimension d = 3 and at our macroscopic scale, the Gross-Pitaevskii limit corresponds to replacing λw by λw λ with w λ (x) = λ −3 w(x/λ) in our many-particle Hamiltonian. In this case one would expect the phase transition to be described by the (appropriately renormalized) nonlinear Gibbs measure µ over the torus T 3 , with w replaced by the Dirac delta 8πaδ 0 where a is the scattering length of w [115,114,48]. Proving such a result seems a formidable task.…”
Section: (B8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other rigorous mathematical works on the Bose gas taking temperature into account include [17,144,145,147,167,49,48]. In particular, the rigorous derivation of the Bose-Einstein phase transition in interacting Bose gases still seems way out of reach, except for special lattice models [114,Chapter 11] and for the trapped case in the Gross-Pitaevskii limit which was recently solved by Deuchert-Seiringer-Yngvason [49,48]. To our knowledge, the only mathematical works devoted to the study of the behavior close to the Bose-Einstein phase transition are [103,107,60,154,62] for equilibrium states and [61] in the one-dimensional dynamical case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is actually a difference of two quantities which are individually infinite µ 0almost surely. Estimates on relative one-particle density matrices related to (3.9) are recently obtained in [49,48], but in a different setting, without divergences.…”
“…There exist only very limited rigorous results about the free energy of a bosonic system starting from a many-body Schrödinger Hamiltonian. In fact, in the dilute regime, the homogeneous gas in three dimensions has been treated by Seiringer [35] and Yin [38] (see also [8,9] for recent developments for the trapped and Gross-Pitaevskii cases). The lower [35] and upper bound [38] prove the free energy asymptotics F (T, ρ) = F 0 (T, ρ) + 4πa 2ρ 2 − [ρ − ρ fc ] 2 + + o(aρ 2 ) as ρa 3 → 0.…”
We extend the analysis of the Bogoliubov free energy functional to two dimensions at very low temperatures. For sufficiently weak interactions, we prove two term asymptotics for the ground state energy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.