2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-003-0477-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grope cobordism and feynman diagrams

Abstract: Abstract. We explain how the usual algebras of Feynman diagrams behave under the grope degree introduced in [CT]. We show that the Kontsevich integral rationally classifies grope cobordisms of knots in 3-space when the "class" is used to organize gropes. This implies that the grope cobordism equivalence relations are highly nontrivial in dimension 3. We also show that the class is not a useful organizing complexity in 4 dimensions since only the Arf invariant survives. In contrast, measuring gropes according t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(4 reference statements)
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalence of (i) and (ii) also follows indirectly from results in [Conant and Teichner 2004b;2004a;Cochran et al 2003]; see particularly [Conant and Teichner 2004a, Proposition 3.8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The equivalence of (i) and (ii) also follows indirectly from results in [Conant and Teichner 2004b;2004a;Cochran et al 2003]; see particularly [Conant and Teichner 2004a, Proposition 3.8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In this section we will review definitions of twisted and framed asymmetric Whitney towers in 4-manifolds, and discuss uni-trivalent trees which arise naturally in the study of iterated intersections of surfaces, particularly for Whitney towers (e.g., see [Coc90,CT04a,CT04b,Sch06,CST07,CST12c,CST14]). Readers who are familiar with them may skip to Section 3, after reading this paragraph.…”
Section: Whitney Towers and Associated Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. By geometric IHX relations [2,8] (which preserve framings) one can write M C = M C 1 ∪···∪C k , where each C i is a clasper of order n with a +1-framed unknotted leaf adjacent to a trivalent vertex which is adjacent to another leaf. The +1-framed unknotted leaf of each C i bounds an embedded disk which intersects the other claspers and may even have interior intersections with C i .…”
Section: Lemma 19mentioning
confidence: 99%