2011
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnr186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gromov-Witten Invariants of Stable Maps with Fields

Abstract: Abstract. We construct the Gromov-Witten invariants of moduli of stable morphisms to P 4 with fields. This is the all genus mathematical theory of the Guffin-Sharpe-Witten model, and is a modified twisted Gromov-Witten invariants of P 4 . These invariants are constructed using the cosection localization of Kiem-Li, an algebro-geometric analogue of Witten's perturbed equations in Landau-Ginzburg theory. We prove that these invariants coincide, up to sign, with the Gromov-Witten invariants of quintics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are finally able to study the cone C Z p / XP . This is going to be a word-byword repetition of the arguments in [CL12].…”
Section: Splitting the Cone And Proof Of The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are finally able to study the cone C Z p / XP . This is going to be a word-byword repetition of the arguments in [CL12].…”
Section: Splitting the Cone And Proof Of The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be their respective virtual normal cones [BF, LT]. Applying argument analogous to [CL2,Coro. 2.9] (see also [KKP,Prop.…”
Section: The Virtual Cycle [W γ ] Vir Locmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, b K )}. And (∞, ϑ 0 )-stable LGquasimaps to X geom are stable maps to X F with p-fields, studied in [CL11,CLL13].…”
Section: K+1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both theories have the same moduli spaces, but the virtual cycle constructions are different. For ε = ∞, Chang-Li [CL11] proved the equivalence using a sophisticated degeneration argument. A similar argument probably works for other ε-theories.…”
Section: K+1mentioning
confidence: 99%