2007
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2007.233.417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gromov–Witten invariants of a quintic threefold and a rigidity conjecture

Abstract: We show that a widely believed conjecture concerning rigidity of genuszero and genus-one holomorphic curves in Calabi-Yau threefolds implies a relation between the genus-one GW-invariants of a quintic threefold in ‫ސ‬ 4 and the genus-zero and genus-one GW-invariants of ‫ސ‬ 4 . This relation is a special case of a general formula for the genus-one GW-invariants of complete intersections obtained in a previous paper. In contrast to the general case, this paper's derivation is more geometric and makes direct use … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1.3 is a particular case of [30] which holds for X any compact symplectic manifold of dimension 2 and 3 and of [29] which holds for X any compact symplectic manifold of any dimension. A similar statement appears in [19,20]. Algebraically it has been proved by Chang and Li [5], for X the quintic threefold, using a slightly different definition for reduced Gromov-Witten invariants to Zinger [30].…”
Section: Introduction Outline Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1.3 is a particular case of [30] which holds for X any compact symplectic manifold of dimension 2 and 3 and of [29] which holds for X any compact symplectic manifold of any dimension. A similar statement appears in [19,20]. Algebraically it has been proved by Chang and Li [5], for X the quintic threefold, using a slightly different definition for reduced Gromov-Witten invariants to Zinger [30].…”
Section: Introduction Outline Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Reduced invariants were defined, using symplectic methods, and compared to Gromov-Witten invariants by Zinger [28][29][30]32]. Li-Zinger showed [19,20] that reduced Gromov-Witten invariants are the integral of the top Chern class of a sheaf over the main component of M (P); this is an analog, for reduced genus 1 invariants, of the quantum Lefschetz hyperplane property [19,20]. In view of [30] this also gives a proof of Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Introduction Outline Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various special cases of Theorem 1.2, such as those in Examples A-C, are standard in the algebraic setting and are used in [3], [13], and [26], for example. Some special cases of Theorem 1.2 have appeared in the symplectic setting as well, including in [16], [24], and [33]. Examples B and C generalize Example A in two opposite directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f : M β,1 −→ M β is the forgetful map and N |β| is the normal bundle to the family of simple curves of class |β|. Similarly to Section 3.3 in [12], we choose a family of "exponential" maps…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12) where O B −→ Z T ,B is the obstruction bundle associated with the moduli space M (0,m) (X, β).Let ν ∈ Γ(Z T , O) be the section induced by ν:ν(b) is the projection of ν(b) to the cokernel of D b . We writeν There is a natural projection mapπ : Z T ,B −→ M β,1 , sending π B ([Σ, u]) to (u(Σ), u(Σ P )).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%