2011
DOI: 10.1145/2016567.2016594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gröbner bases and generalized sylvester matrices

Abstract: In his PhD thesis [1], Buchberger introduced the notion of Gröbner bases and gave the first algorithm for computing them. Since then, extensive research has been done in order to reduce the complexity of the computation. But nevertheless, even for small examples the computation sometimes does not terminate in reasonable time.There are basically two approaches for computing a Gröbner basis. The first is the one pursued by the Buchberger algorithm: We start from the initial set F , execute certain reduction step… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, browsing through the ample literature on the subject one quickly realizes that a lot more properties of Gröbner bases, ways of computing them, generalizations, and intriguing applications could be added to the corpus of formal mathematics in the future; examples include Gröbner bases over coefficient rings that are no fields, elimination orders and their applications, converting between different term orders, and non-commutative Gröbner bases. We plan to contribute to this endeavor by formalizing the very recent approach of computing Gröbner bases by transforming Macaulay matrices (or generalized Sylvester matrices) into reduced row echelon form [35] in Isabelle/HOL. This approach has similarities to the F 4 algorithm but only computes the reduced row echelon form of one big matrix, instead of doing this repeatedly in every iteration of a critical-pair/completion algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, browsing through the ample literature on the subject one quickly realizes that a lot more properties of Gröbner bases, ways of computing them, generalizations, and intriguing applications could be added to the corpus of formal mathematics in the future; examples include Gröbner bases over coefficient rings that are no fields, elimination orders and their applications, converting between different term orders, and non-commutative Gröbner bases. We plan to contribute to this endeavor by formalizing the very recent approach of computing Gröbner bases by transforming Macaulay matrices (or generalized Sylvester matrices) into reduced row echelon form [35] in Isabelle/HOL. This approach has similarities to the F 4 algorithm but only computes the reduced row echelon form of one big matrix, instead of doing this repeatedly in every iteration of a critical-pair/completion algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many possibilities for future work. On the theory level, other aspects of, and approaches to, Gröbner bases (again in the original setting) could be formalized, for instance the computation of Gröbner bases by matrix triangularizations [17]. For this, the further improvement of the tools described in Sect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in computer vision, polynomial systems often have the same support for different values of their coefficients. Then, it is efficient [11,58] to construct T a by (i) building a Macaulay matrix M using a fixed procedure -a template -designed in the offline phase, and then (ii) produce T a in the online phase by the G-J elimination of M [10,29]. Our main contribution, Sec.…”
Section: Solving Polynomial Systems By Action Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%