2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grip and shoulder strength correlation with validated outcome instruments in patients with rotator cuff tears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may be related to overcompensation during handgrip strength testing on the affected side, but there were no data to support this hypothesis. Although ipsilateral handgrip strength and shoulder strength have been correlated in other previous studies, 40,41 including our own, 13 there was no correlation between fatty infiltration and absolute handgrip strength in the present study.…”
Section: Supraspinatus Fatty Infiltration Correlation Continuedcontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding may be related to overcompensation during handgrip strength testing on the affected side, but there were no data to support this hypothesis. Although ipsilateral handgrip strength and shoulder strength have been correlated in other previous studies, 40,41 including our own, 13 there was no correlation between fatty infiltration and absolute handgrip strength in the present study.…”
Section: Supraspinatus Fatty Infiltration Correlation Continuedcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In a previous study, we examined the correlation of handgrip and shoulder strength with patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in patients with rotator cuff tears. 13 Herein, the earlier study was extended to include fatty infiltration in the rotator cuff musculature. Historically, Goutallier et al 14 showed on computed tomography (CT) scans that patients undergoing rotator cuff repair had greater fatty tissue infiltration within the rotator cuff compared to their normal asymptomatic counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size calculation was based on following set-ups: (1) type I error at 0.05, (2) power at 0.8, (3) a two-tailed test, and the results of Manske et al [ 27 ]. To reach a power of 0.8, a sample size of 52 was needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main outcome measures used for evaluation of hand motor function recovery after RC tears were the following: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), which is a comprehensive self-administered questionnaire about the symptoms and functioning of the entire upper extremity [ 20 ]; manual muscle testing (MMT), used as a method of measuring upper extremity muscle strength [ 21 , 22 ]; hand grip muscle strength, tested by hydraulic hand dynamometry (HD, in kg) to obtain kinematic parameters of requested movements; and active ROM of the shoulder and elbow were measured [ 13 ]. As a psychometric response scale and measurement instrument for the subjective states of intensity, severity, and nature of experienced pain was used VAS scale [ 2 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher levels of psychological distress are also correlated with decreased patient-reported outcomes after surgical intervention. Greater levels of pre- or postoperative psychological distress and subjective well-being (SWB) were not associated with clinically important differences in outcome scores (visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, hand functionality-evaluated scores) one year after arthroscopic RC repair; similarly, higher levels of distress were not associated with less interval improvement in outcome scores at one year [ 19 , 20 ]. RC tears are a quite common condition that is often incapacitating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%