2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grinding characteristics and removal mechanisms of unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced silicon carbide ceramic matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Material of the workpiece is ceramic magnet ferrite with a dimension of 50 mm length, 23 mm width and 2.3 mm thickness. The types of ferrite magnets are Strontium ferrite SrO6 (Fe2O3) with density 4.85 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 and Hardness (HV): 826 ± 10 12,13) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Material of the workpiece is ceramic magnet ferrite with a dimension of 50 mm length, 23 mm width and 2.3 mm thickness. The types of ferrite magnets are Strontium ferrite SrO6 (Fe2O3) with density 4.85 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 and Hardness (HV): 826 ± 10 12,13) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grinding process uses a special grinding machine which was designed by the factory to grind ferrite magnet directly as it comes from the mold, the machine works sequentially with a conveyor feeding system. The workpiece enters in the initial dimension called raw material and passes the stage of the grinding position 3,4) . Until it gets the desired dimension, the grinding process starts at position 1 and position 2, i.e.…”
Section: Grinding Process Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is probably due to the increased mass transfer because of the presence of B 4 C and the removal of the silica layer by carbon. [61][62][63][64][65] But this amount of carbon does not seem to be enough to reach the highest density. In the A7, A15 and A23 samples, an increase in carbon of up to 2.5 wt% further increased the density to 98.5%.…”
Section: Density and Porosity Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For composites grinding, 3D surface profile characterization was more comprehensive and scientific than traditional roughness characterization [19][20][21]. It was found that fiber orientation and grinding parameters were the significant influence factors of composites grinding, which had important effect on grinding force and surface quality [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%