2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40789-016-0138-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grinding analysis of Indian coal using response surface methodology

Abstract: The present work discusses a systematic approach to model grinding parameters of coal in a ball mill. A three level Box-Behnken design combined with response surface methodology using second order model was applied to the experiments done according to the model requirement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Box-Behnken design method using 27 experiment with 4 parameters formed by 6 central points and 6 axial points to 2 3 full factorial design was used (Mathekar and Agrawal, 2017). Using this Therefore, these four independent parameters were coded at three levels that is +1, 0, and -1 with same step size, where +1 represents the maximum value, 0 represents to the center, and -1 represents the minimum value of each parameter which are considered for analysis (Singh et al, 2016 andMomenzadeh et al, 2011). Within the present research framework, the discussion was focused on the effect of amount of feed (x 1 ), temperature of drying (x 2 ), velocity of hot air (x 3 ), and drying time (x 4 ).…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Box-Behnken design method using 27 experiment with 4 parameters formed by 6 central points and 6 axial points to 2 3 full factorial design was used (Mathekar and Agrawal, 2017). Using this Therefore, these four independent parameters were coded at three levels that is +1, 0, and -1 with same step size, where +1 represents the maximum value, 0 represents to the center, and -1 represents the minimum value of each parameter which are considered for analysis (Singh et al, 2016 andMomenzadeh et al, 2011). Within the present research framework, the discussion was focused on the effect of amount of feed (x 1 ), temperature of drying (x 2 ), velocity of hot air (x 3 ), and drying time (x 4 ).…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quanti cation and phase identi cation were then performed using the Bruker (D8) Advance powder diffractometer equipment that made use of [Cu K−alpha] radiation with a wavelength of [1.5418] and step counts [0.02] degrees increment at durations of [0.500 sec/stem] such that the (2θ) angle ware ranged between [2θ: (8°≤θ≤80°)]. Moreover, the device was operated at (40mA) and (40kv) overnight to accommodate all the ve (5) samples in our study [28], [31], [32], [33], [35].…”
Section: Ray Diffraction Spectroscopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%