IntroductionThis paper summarises the insights of the qualitative study, "living the good life with quadriplegia," which explores how the stories people tell about themselves reveal their understanding of what it means to flourish, and how they have all accomplished it.As reflected in media and pop cultural advocacy promoting the legalisation of euthanasia for people who become a quadriplegic, 1 it is generally assumed that it is impossible to live the good life with a severe spinal cord injury (SCI). In fact, contrary to expectations, the majority of people adapt to life with the injury. The so-called disability paradox describes the difference between the seemingly inescapable conclusion that disability negatively impacts happiness, and the reality that many people with serious disabilities report to having a good life. 2 In part, this follows the theory of the hedonic treadmill, which asserts that although positive and negative events temporarily impact happiness, people quickly return to hedonic neutrality -to a set point level of subjective well-being that is substantially determined by personality traits. 3 In respect to hedonic theory and SCI, it has been found that even though people do adjust to the injury, achieving a relatively stable level of happiness, the losses and pains they suffer do substantially and permanently reduce life satisfaction. 4 The real problem with hedonic theory, however, is the implication that individual choices and circumstances make little difference to a person's happiness.The hedonic treadmill is limited by its focus on subjective measures of happiness. Influenced by the emergence of positive psychology, more recent studies of the resilience of people with an SCI have sought to take into account broader conceptions of happiness, recognising that a person's flourishing is both subjective and objective, and includes: having a greater balance of positive over negative emotions, engagement in gratifying activities, experiencing positive relationships, living for purpose and meaning, and achieving goals. 5 Positive psychology set out to ground conceptions of flourishing and psychological strength in the rigours of empirical science; "in statistical tests, validated questionnaires, thoroughly researched exercises, and large, representative samples." 6In the context of SCI, positive psychology gave impetus to studies that sought to identify the virtues and strengths that help a person flourish with the injury, in particular those that facilitate resilience, which is generally defined as positive adjustment to adversity. 7 There are a myriad of factors that, to greater and lesser degrees, might contribute to resilience; biological, demographic, environmental/social, and psychological. It is noteworthy that biological determinants, such as the level and severity of injury, have less impact than might be imagined, 8 although the evidence is mixed, with some studies finding that people with high-level quadriplegia, and those who suffer substantive pain, do report lower levels of well-be...