2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.08645
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grids of stellar models with rotation VII: Models from 0.8 to 300 M$_\odot$ at super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.020)

Norhasliza Yusof,
Raphael Hirschi,
Patrick Eggenberger
et al.

Abstract: We present a grid of stellar models at super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.020) extending the previous grids of Geneva models at solar and sub-solar metallicities. A metallicity of Z = 0.020 was chosen to match that of the inner Galactic disk. A modest increase of 43% (=0.02/0.014) in metallicity compared to solar models means that the models evolve similarly to solar models but with slightly larger mass loss. Mass loss limits the final total masses of the super-solar models to 35 M even for stars with initial mass… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppressing supernova feedback for several million years has the effect of boosting the overall star formation efficiency (fraction of the gas turned into GC stars), allowing more 1G-processed material to become available for the formation of 2G stars. With only 3 Myr duration for the star formation phase, only binary components more massive than ∼ 100 M ⊙ would have had time to evolve off the main sequence (Yusof et al 2022), fill their Roche lobe, and deliver their processed envelopes. This would probably fall short of accounting for the required mass budget, whereas extending to a 10 Myr interval would allow stars down to ∼ 20 M ⊙ to contribute.…”
Section: What Was the Sequence Of Events?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppressing supernova feedback for several million years has the effect of boosting the overall star formation efficiency (fraction of the gas turned into GC stars), allowing more 1G-processed material to become available for the formation of 2G stars. With only 3 Myr duration for the star formation phase, only binary components more massive than ∼ 100 M ⊙ would have had time to evolve off the main sequence (Yusof et al 2022), fill their Roche lobe, and deliver their processed envelopes. This would probably fall short of accounting for the required mass budget, whereas extending to a 10 Myr interval would allow stars down to ∼ 20 M ⊙ to contribute.…”
Section: What Was the Sequence Of Events?mentioning
confidence: 99%