The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grice's Cooperative Principle: Meaning and rationality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
45
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Mey (2001) adds that not everyone is willing or participates in a conversation by consciously observing Grice's maxims. In fact, Grice's Cooperative Principles are not universal because it depends on the cultural background of the speaker and the context in which the conversation occurs (Lumsden 2008, Davies 2007, Kheirabadi & Aghagolzadeh 2012, Simons 2017. Thus, it is common for the non-observance of Grice's Cooperative Principle and the maxims during interactions, but to what extent is politeness retained is investigated in this study.…”
Section: The Cooperative Principlementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mey (2001) adds that not everyone is willing or participates in a conversation by consciously observing Grice's maxims. In fact, Grice's Cooperative Principles are not universal because it depends on the cultural background of the speaker and the context in which the conversation occurs (Lumsden 2008, Davies 2007, Kheirabadi & Aghagolzadeh 2012, Simons 2017. Thus, it is common for the non-observance of Grice's Cooperative Principle and the maxims during interactions, but to what extent is politeness retained is investigated in this study.…”
Section: The Cooperative Principlementioning
confidence: 97%
“…His Speech Act Theory mostly explains that utterances have three parts or aspects: locutionary, perlocutionary, and illocutionary acts. Austin explained that there is a clear distinction between words that are uttered which he called "locution," the effect that speech brings which he called "perlocution," and the very act of speaking which he called "illocution" (Davies, 2007;Fisher, 2010). People do not only utter words, but they also act with their speech.…”
Section: Speech Acts Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although relying foremost on discourse analysis, I also included the following fields in my attempt to discover what supported the text: (1) Pragmatics, through the works of Austin's (1962) types of meaning and speech acts, Grice's (1978) cooperative principle, conversational maxims and implicatures, politeness theory, presuppositions, and deictic reference (see Brown & Yule, 1983, 1987Davies, 2007;Ishihara & Cohen, 2010;Paltridge, 2006;Thomas, 1995;Vallée, 2008), (2) Conversational analysis, with particular reference in this paper to features such as turn-taking and topic management (Wooffitt, 2005), (3) Ethnography of communication, through the works of Hymes on components of a situation (see Schiffrin, 1994, p. 374), and (4) identities and gender in discourse (see Fasold, 1990;Ndambuki & Janks, 2010).…”
Section: Context Of Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%