1979
DOI: 10.1136/gut.20.7.590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grey scale ultrasound in Crohn's disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasonic (US) signs of Crohn's disease (CD) have been previously described in many uncontrolled studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and in a few prospective, controlled investigations, in which sensitivity and specificity of US diag nostic criteria in CD were evaluated [9][10][11], The conclusions of these papers were that ultrasound examination is a suitable comple mentary method for the detection of CD. On the other hand, ultrasonography has been considered not useful to differentiate CD from ulcerative colitis (UC) [9], Yet, Dub bins [12], measuring bowel wall thickness by means of US in an uncontrolled study in 28 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Worlicek et al [13] in a con trolled, prospective study suggested a possi ble role of US in the differential diagnosis and follow-up of IBD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic (US) signs of Crohn's disease (CD) have been previously described in many uncontrolled studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and in a few prospective, controlled investigations, in which sensitivity and specificity of US diag nostic criteria in CD were evaluated [9][10][11], The conclusions of these papers were that ultrasound examination is a suitable comple mentary method for the detection of CD. On the other hand, ultrasonography has been considered not useful to differentiate CD from ulcerative colitis (UC) [9], Yet, Dub bins [12], measuring bowel wall thickness by means of US in an uncontrolled study in 28 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Worlicek et al [13] in a con trolled, prospective study suggested a possi ble role of US in the differential diagnosis and follow-up of IBD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important sonographic finding is represented by the segmental wall thickening. The sensitivity of US is 75-94% and the specificity is 67-100% [26,31,32]. In the early activity phase of the disease a process of angiogenesis takes place in the mucosa and submucosa [33].…”
Section: Small Intestinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Holt et al 1979, Wellmann et al 1980 Ältere Arbeiten der Angiographie [Bousen et al 1966, Lunderquist 1967 [Sonnenberg et al 1982].…”
unclassified
“…[Graham und Jackson 1993, Munoz et al 1997, Chmura et al 2002, Kundel et al 2003, Sim et al 2005. [Holt et al 1979, Kimmey et al 1989, Meckler et al1991, Hata et al 1992]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%