2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-01202-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenwash and green purchase behavior: an environmentally sustainable perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only this approach can ensure they are aligned with a TBL approach (Elkington, 1997). Companies who certify should be aware that, although the alignment between their claims and their scores is not verified by B Lab, they would benefit from ensuring that this alignment exists, otherwise exposing themselves to the risks of greenwashing (Hameed et al, 2021). These companies should also make sure they are addressing the most critical sustainability issues from the start, as the certification is gradually becoming more stringent through its 3‐year cycle revision process and we are confident that it will, in time, limit the possibility for companies to commit the “sin of lesser of two evils” (Delmas & Burbano, 2011; UL, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only this approach can ensure they are aligned with a TBL approach (Elkington, 1997). Companies who certify should be aware that, although the alignment between their claims and their scores is not verified by B Lab, they would benefit from ensuring that this alignment exists, otherwise exposing themselves to the risks of greenwashing (Hameed et al, 2021). These companies should also make sure they are addressing the most critical sustainability issues from the start, as the certification is gradually becoming more stringent through its 3‐year cycle revision process and we are confident that it will, in time, limit the possibility for companies to commit the “sin of lesser of two evils” (Delmas & Burbano, 2011; UL, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have highlighted the potential negative effects of greenwash practices. For example, greenwash negatively impacts green brand equity [108] and will reduce consumers' green purchase intention [109,110]. However, the reusable tableware brand, which makes sustainable tableware, may not see the green marketing of its products as relevant to Green Wash.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third variable that supposedly influences the environmental context in GITL is environmental sustainability motivating forces, as explained by the theory of planned behavior (TPB) [32], which refers to the social [91], ecological [92], [93], and end-company prestige implications [94] that organizations adopt to improve their image and favor planet care while optimizing resources and productivity.…”
Section: Environmental Sustainability Motivating Forces (Esm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external regulatory framework that regulates organizational operations considers environmental aspects. Variable: Environmental sustainability motivational forces ( ESM) Source: [32], [88], [91], [94]- [99], [174]…”
Section: Enc4mentioning
confidence: 99%