2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse gas impact of dual stream and single stream collection and separation of recyclables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of Figure 1-14, however, is primarily to illustrate significant differences in emissions which will dramatically affect the results of an LCA involving the recycling of materials. To put these data in context, estimates of emissions associated with other waste management activities are presented, namely collection (47-57 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Eisted et al, 2009), separation in sorting plants (11 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Fitzgerald et al, 2012), landfilling in an average U.S. site (26 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Levis and Barlaz, 2011) and combustion (324-480 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Larsen and Astrup, 2011)). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of Figure 1-14, however, is primarily to illustrate significant differences in emissions which will dramatically affect the results of an LCA involving the recycling of materials. To put these data in context, estimates of emissions associated with other waste management activities are presented, namely collection (47-57 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Eisted et al, 2009), separation in sorting plants (11 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Fitzgerald et al, 2012), landfilling in an average U.S. site (26 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Levis and Barlaz, 2011) and combustion (324-480 kg CO 2 -eq/tonne (Larsen and Astrup, 2011)). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the complexity of the MWMS comes from the dichotomy between its two complementary aspects: the economic costs and the environmental impacts of the strategies [2,3]. Many researchers completed multiple assessments of MWMS environmental impacts [8,9], from single stream collection versus the separation of recyclables [10], to specific products [11], such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and glass bottles [12,13]. However, the complex link between consumers behaviors and MWMS mass flows remains a significant and sensitive element of these assessment studies.…”
Section: Solid Waste Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a general consensus in the available literature that single stream recycling offers the potential for more efficient collection and reduced collection costs. [3,4] found that the increased adoption of single stream recycling systems in the United States is largely driven by increased waste diversion rates for participating communities. In [4]'s review of several communities across multiple states, it was found that the change from multi-stream to single stream recycling resulted in an approximately 50% increase in the production of recyclable commodities and an accompanying decrease in per tonne material management costs.…”
Section: Findings On Performance Of Single Vs Multi-stream Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] found that the increased adoption of single stream recycling systems in the United States is largely driven by increased waste diversion rates for participating communities. In [4]'s review of several communities across multiple states, it was found that the change from multi-stream to single stream recycling resulted in an approximately 50% increase in the production of recyclable commodities and an accompanying decrease in per tonne material management costs. Similar results were observed by [5], which found that the collection savings from single stream systems ranged from $10 to $20 per tonne, while [6] reported that the potential savings associated with single stream collection can vary from 5% to 25%.…”
Section: Findings On Performance Of Single Vs Multi-stream Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%