2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse gas fluxes from a grazed grassland soil after slurry injections and mineral fertilizer applications under the Atlantic climatic conditions of NW Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of livestock grazing on GHG emissions has long been recognized 2427 , but only a few studies have looked at the effect of different grazing management (e.g. rotational versus continuous grazing) on GHG emissions on the Tibetan grassland 2830 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of livestock grazing on GHG emissions has long been recognized 2427 , but only a few studies have looked at the effect of different grazing management (e.g. rotational versus continuous grazing) on GHG emissions on the Tibetan grassland 2830 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems undoubted, that the high N 2 O emissions after slurry injection are mainly the result of enhanced denitrification (e.g., [18,88]), and consequently, slurry injection may be a suitable technique for NH 3 mitigation at production sites with a low denitrification potential. Low EFs for organic fertilizers have been reported for the Mediterranean region with low precipitation [89], and consequently, Louro et al [90] did not find any effect of slurry injection on N 2 O emissions. On well aerated sandy soils, slurry injection might also help to improve NH 3 reduction with only a small increase in N 2 O emission, but other factors like high humus contents may counteract N 2 O mitigation [91].…”
Section: Effect Of Environmental Conditions and Nis On Nnnual N 2 O Emission And Corresponding Efsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This position is strongly in agreement with a recent life cycle assessment (LCA) study at the study site (the NWFP), which found that amongst all sources of uncertainty surrounding carbon footprints of grazing enterprises, uncertainty associated with N 2 O EFs is the largest, and therefore hedging the risk through a mixed strategy would be a sensible approach ( Takahashi et al, 2019 ). In this context, other on-farm options that could contribute to the solution package include: light interception control through manipulation of sward structure ( Congio et al, 2019 ); fertiliser selection to enhance pasture growth and thus the stocking rate ( Louro et al, 2016 ); diet formulation to control N load and urination volume ( Marsden et al, 2016 ); and direct control of grazing intensity ( Tang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%