2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse gas emissions from storage and field application of anaerobically digested and non-digested cattle slurry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent studies have shown that this benefit could be counteracted by methane emissions during storage and spreading of compost and manure, implying the importance of improved management of this potential important nutrient and energy resource (Daniel-Gromke et al 2015;Rodhe et al 2015).…”
Section: Mitigating and Adapting To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have shown that this benefit could be counteracted by methane emissions during storage and spreading of compost and manure, implying the importance of improved management of this potential important nutrient and energy resource (Daniel-Gromke et al 2015;Rodhe et al 2015).…”
Section: Mitigating and Adapting To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, in studies on emissions from fields fertilized with organic fertilizers, the chamber method is used (Clemens et al, 2006, Johansen et al, 2013Rodhe et al, 2015). In this method, chambers are placed on the soils after digestate application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agriculture contributes globally 10-12% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (IPCC, 2007) and land applied organic manures contribute substantially to this (e.g. Rodhe et al, 2015) through the release of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N O) from carbon (C) and N compounds in the manures and also, indirectly, by affecting soil properties which can increase GHG emissions from soils (Thangarajan et al, 2013). For example, Huang et al (2004) reported that manures with high C:N ratios may reduce CO 2 emissions and increase soil organic carbon, while manures with low C:N ratios may lead to an increase in soil CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Huang et al (2004) reported that manures with high C:N ratios may reduce CO 2 emissions and increase soil organic carbon, while manures with low C:N ratios may lead to an increase in soil CO 2 emissions. Emissions of CH 4 , which is generated under anaerobic conditions, tend to be limited from slurries applied to well aerated soils; however, slurry storage emissions can be substantial and can exceed those from landspreading (Rodhe et al, 2015). Currently in many countries, abatement of such emissions during storage is seen as a cost effective measure to meet national emission targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%