2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2005.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential of agriculture in the central USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
92
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
7
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the magnitude of GHG emissions is a result not just of land use practices but also of land use change, which is not captured by synchronic analysis (8). Second, the soil GHG flux at any point in time depends on the previous land use history (8,12,16,17). Third, some practices that enhance soil C sequestration, such as fertilizer application and irrigation, increase GHG emissions from N 2 O release and fossil fuel burning (9,18).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the magnitude of GHG emissions is a result not just of land use practices but also of land use change, which is not captured by synchronic analysis (8). Second, the soil GHG flux at any point in time depends on the previous land use history (8,12,16,17). Third, some practices that enhance soil C sequestration, such as fertilizer application and irrigation, increase GHG emissions from N 2 O release and fossil fuel burning (9,18).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring of soil organic matter (SOM) change is important to determine the sustainability of soil health and productivity as we face some daunting challenges in climate change. Improvement in SOC sequestration is an integrative process of atmosphere-plant-soil that has been widely documented in the literature (e.g., Franzluebbers 2010;Johnson et al 2005;Liebig et al 2005;Franzluebbers and Follett 2005;West and Post 2002;Lal 1999). However, most of the documented SOC sequestration rates have been determined using the "paired comparison method," which refers to the comparison of two tillage systems to each other with the absence of the pretreatment baseline for SOC stocks measured prior to the implementation of such tillage treatments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil organic C content data (Mg C ha -1 ) from numerous field studies comparing tillage systems primarily, but also comparing crop rotation, fertilizer, and cover crop systems throughout the Midwest were obtained from original studies reported in the review of the region by Johnson et al (2005). Index scores of SCI were predicted using Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 2 (RUSLE2) version 1.26.6.4 for locations and management conditions that closely matched those from published reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent regional literature reviews have documented the potential of conservation agricultural systems to sequester SOC (West and Post 2002;VandenBygaart et al 2003;Franzluebbers 2005;2010;Johnson et al 2005;Liebig et al 2005). Unfortunately, results appear to be site, soil, and cropping system specific, resulting in uncertainty of how to predict the effect of management in different environments (Varvel 1994;Dick et al 1998;VandenBygaart et al 2002;Venterea et al 2006;Gál et al 2007).…”
Section: Abstract: Conservation Tillage-crop Rotation-modeling-no-timentioning
confidence: 99%