2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-016-0220-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse climate fuzzy adaptive control considering energy saving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also found from a comparison of cooling energy consumption between Periods 2 and 3 that hourly energy consumption in Period 3 is significantly less than that in Period 2 (Table A4). The control settings of vents opening and shade screen closing during the day for energy savings could be used to extend the control strategies in greenhouses reported by previous studies [26,28]. Further analysis of energy consumption taking into consideration of temperature profile of the facility and outside temperature under two extreme configuration settings tested (Periods 2 and 3) found that cooling energy consumption can be benchmarked using the cooling energy consumption (kWh) per 1 • C reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It was also found from a comparison of cooling energy consumption between Periods 2 and 3 that hourly energy consumption in Period 3 is significantly less than that in Period 2 (Table A4). The control settings of vents opening and shade screen closing during the day for energy savings could be used to extend the control strategies in greenhouses reported by previous studies [26,28]. Further analysis of energy consumption taking into consideration of temperature profile of the facility and outside temperature under two extreme configuration settings tested (Periods 2 and 3) found that cooling energy consumption can be benchmarked using the cooling energy consumption (kWh) per 1 • C reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, it is the motivation of this work to develop an optimal control approach for greenhouse climate. To illustrate the advantage of the proposed approach, we have performed a comparison with AFC, 40 as shown in Figure 7. From Figure 7, we can see that, in most cases, the tracking error of the NNOC is smaller than that of the AFC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the weight update laws (21), (40), and (50) of the 3 NN identifiers can guarantee the asymptotical convergence of the closed-loop system and the UUB performance of the tracking error e k .…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the implementation of energy supply optimization strategies is another aspect of efficiently improving the water, energy, and food security in greenhouses. The optimization strategies have varied from feedback conventional controllers to advanced ones based on artificial intelligence such as: fuzzy logic controllers (Su et al 2017), hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms (Chen et al 2015), model predictive controllers (Ouammi et al 2020a, b;Lin et al 2020) and optimal controllers (Beveren et al 2015, Beveren et al 2020Singh et al 2015). Their common goal is to maximize production yield by tracking the desired trajectories of the controlled variables while minimizing the use of available water and energy resources.…”
Section: Energy Considerations In Smart Greenhousesmentioning
confidence: 99%