2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green synthesis of Fe and Fe/Pd bimetallic nanoparticles in membranes for reductive degradation of chlorinated organics

Abstract: Membranes containing reactive nanoparticles (Fe and Fe/Pd) immobilized in a polymer film (polyacrylic acid, PAA-coated polyvinylidene fluoride, PVDF membrane) are prepared by a new method. In the present work a biodegradable, non-toxic -“green” reducing agent, green tea extract was used for nanoparticle (NP) synthesis, instead of the well-known sodium borohydride. Green tea extract contains a number of polyphenols that can act as both chelating/reducing and capping agents for the nanoparticles. Therefore, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(49 reference statements)
4
122
2
Order By: Relevance
“…OMW-CE-nFe were composed of nanocarbon spheres, instead of the common microspheres of 6-8 μm which are obtained when glucose or sucrose are used as a feedstock 6,22 , presented a higher surface area and a greater incorporation of iron into the material. The differences between G-CE-nFe and OMW-CE-nFe could be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 13 carbonaceous source used for the HTC process, different structures can be obtained for the final material, and OMW has proven to be able to produce nanocarbon spheres of very low size, thus being a promising raw material for the green synthesis of nanomaterials.…”
Section: Comparison Between Omw and Glucose As A Feedstock For Ce-nfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…OMW-CE-nFe were composed of nanocarbon spheres, instead of the common microspheres of 6-8 μm which are obtained when glucose or sucrose are used as a feedstock 6,22 , presented a higher surface area and a greater incorporation of iron into the material. The differences between G-CE-nFe and OMW-CE-nFe could be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 13 carbonaceous source used for the HTC process, different structures can be obtained for the final material, and OMW has proven to be able to produce nanocarbon spheres of very low size, thus being a promising raw material for the green synthesis of nanomaterials.…”
Section: Comparison Between Omw and Glucose As A Feedstock For Ce-nfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blending with nanomaterials can provide membranes with some benefits like [13,14]: (a). [11] Lower agglomeration and corrosion of the nanomaterials / polymeric blend membrane; (b).…”
Section: Membrane-embedded Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported reasonable bactericidal activity against Escherichia coli , Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus . The nanoparticles were synthesized with membranes containing reactive nanoparticles (Fe and Fe/Pd) immobilized in a polymer fi lm (polyacrylic acid, PAA-coated polyvinylidene fl uoride, PVDF membrane) using a biodegradable, non-toxic green reducing agent (green tea extract, i.e., polyphenols) [49] . The synthesized particles are protected from oxidation and aggregation, which increases their stability and longevity.…”
Section: Production Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membranes comprising reactive nanoparticles (Fe and Fe/Pd) immobilized in a polymer fi lm (polyacrylic acid, PAA-coated polyvinylidene fl uoride, PVDF membrane) were used for the preparation of nanoparticles [49] . The membrane supported nanoparticles were successfully used for the degradation of a common and highly important pollutant, trichloroethylene (TCE).…”
Section: Multifunctional Membrane Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%