2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(02)00015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green’s functions for the bending of thin plates under various boundary conditions and applications: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The function theory in that case becomes significantly easier with the solutions for Φ ( ζ ) and Ψ ( ζ ) also being rational functions. But then the approach we have demonstrated here reduces to ideas that are already well known in solid mechanics; see, for example, the review on the bending of thin plates using the so-called ‘rational function method’ by Hasebe & Wang [ 29 ]. What we have shown here is that if one wants to extend the rational function method to multiply connected regions, then the natural mathematical generalization is to consider the class of multiply connected quadrature domains; the boundaries of those domains can be parametrized by so-called automorphic functions [, 23 , 24 , 26 ] (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function theory in that case becomes significantly easier with the solutions for Φ ( ζ ) and Ψ ( ζ ) also being rational functions. But then the approach we have demonstrated here reduces to ideas that are already well known in solid mechanics; see, for example, the review on the bending of thin plates using the so-called ‘rational function method’ by Hasebe & Wang [ 29 ]. What we have shown here is that if one wants to extend the rational function method to multiply connected regions, then the natural mathematical generalization is to consider the class of multiply connected quadrature domains; the boundaries of those domains can be parametrized by so-called automorphic functions [, 23 , 24 , 26 ] (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%