2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.82.022706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green’s functions and the adiabatic hyperspherical method

Abstract: We address the few-body problem using the adiabatic hyperspherical representation. A general form for the hyperangular Green's function in d-dimensions is derived. The resulting LippmannSchwinger equation is solved for the case of three-particles with s-wave zero-range interactions. Identical particle symmetry is incorporated in a general and intuitive way. Complete semi-analytic expressions for the nonadiabatic channel couplings are derived. Finally, a model to describe the atom-loss due to three-body recombi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, we have shown in this section that the running basis is a convenient choice, whose leading order is the usual adiabatic approximation 40,42 and the correction to it is the Berry connection. we have also argued that the Berry connection must be included for physically consistent calculation, thus we will use the exact formalism in our numerical calculation shown later.…”
Section: Running Basismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In summary, we have shown in this section that the running basis is a convenient choice, whose leading order is the usual adiabatic approximation 40,42 and the correction to it is the Berry connection. we have also argued that the Berry connection must be included for physically consistent calculation, thus we will use the exact formalism in our numerical calculation shown later.…”
Section: Running Basismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the particular case (n, ℓ) = (0, 0), that is for a total degree d = 0 and s = 7/2, there cannot exist a nonzero fermionic polynomial P 0 (x 2 , x 3 ) of degree zero; the expression (46) is a constant, as the change of variable k 2 = x 2 k ′ 2 shows, and so are the contributions to F (0; x 2 , x 3 ) of the pieces f (k 2 ) and f (k 3 ) of D(k 2 , k 3 ), which thus exactly cancel. This was already taken into account in the reasoning above equation (32) and there is no unphysical solution to disregard.…”
Section: For 3 + 1 Fermions This Happens If the Function D Is A Non mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Everything happens as if the particles absent from the set I, that is the spin ↑ particle i = 1 and the spin ↓ particle j = N ↑ +1, were in fact still there and both prepared in the mode (n, ℓ, m) = (0, 0, 0). This adds an extra constraint to the modes (n i , ℓ i , m i ) i∈I that can be populated by fermions, a constraint not included in the reasoning above equation (32). This immediately leads to the occurrence of three types of unphysical solutions:…”
Section: For 3 + 1 Fermions This Happens If the Function D Is A Non mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on earlier work [35][36][37][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], we address the following questions: (Q1) Under which conditions do atom-atom-atom resonances occur for the (2, 1) system? (Q2) Under which conditions do atom-atom-atom-atom resonances occur for the (3,1) system?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%