2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green roof storage capacity can be more important than evapotranspiration for retention performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Under small storms, the role of plants of different water use strategies in the initial capture will be minimal if the substrate has the capacity to retain the storm. However, it is important to also consider the root system of the plants, particularly high water use strategy plants, which may create preferential flow paths in the substrate resulting in a counterintuitive decreased retention under big storms when compared to nonvegetated and low water use strategy plants (Zhang, Szota, Szota, Fletcher, Williams, & Farrell, 2019). Current ET models are mostly from agriculture applications and can struggle to capture the complex interactions between the vegetation, soil, and climate of a green roof.…”
Section: Field Laboratory and Modeling Hydrologic Performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under small storms, the role of plants of different water use strategies in the initial capture will be minimal if the substrate has the capacity to retain the storm. However, it is important to also consider the root system of the plants, particularly high water use strategy plants, which may create preferential flow paths in the substrate resulting in a counterintuitive decreased retention under big storms when compared to nonvegetated and low water use strategy plants (Zhang, Szota, Szota, Fletcher, Williams, & Farrell, 2019). Current ET models are mostly from agriculture applications and can struggle to capture the complex interactions between the vegetation, soil, and climate of a green roof.…”
Section: Field Laboratory and Modeling Hydrologic Performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System features including the porosity of the substrate, substrate composition, and substrate depth have been found to significantly influence evapotranspiration as well as the choice of the plant palette and the transpirational characteristics of the specific plants in the system (Farrell et al 2013;Morgan et al 2013;Nagase and Dunnett 2011;Richter et al 2009;Szota et al 2017;Wolf and Lundholm 2008). In many research experiments evaluating the stormwater retention of green roof systems, unplanted substrate systems have been shown to have significant average stormwater retention values (Morgan et al 2013;Zhang et al 2019) even though these unplanted systems do not provide additional ecosystem services as would be provided in living systems (e.g., biodiversity benefits).…”
Section: Stormwater Retention and Quality Stormwater Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of substrate water storage capacity has also been suggested to be due to plant roots. For larger events (>25 mm), it has been shown that some plant species (S. glauca) had (36%) lower retention than unplanted modules or low-water using succulent species (S. pachyphyllum), even though these species would have higher ET rates [29]. The root structure of these plants potentially results in a greater number of macropores and sub-surface channels causing uneven and rapid water movement through unsaturated parts of the substrate.…”
Section: Observed Stormwater Retention Under Natural Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%