Green performance criteria for sustainable ports in Asia

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to measure a port's green performance. The literature is reviewed and a survey is carried out to identify major green port performance indicators and to evaluate three major ports' overall green performance in Asia. Indicators located in the critical quadrants with a high degree of importance and low degree of performance are identified and resources are suggested that can be employed to improve the ports' overall sustainability performance effectively.Design/methodology/approachPort performance indicators are reviewed to select the green‐related ones by a session of brain storming with academicians from China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan in the shipping discipline. Selected indicators are used to design an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) questionnaire. The weight and degree of performance of each of the 17 green indicators among three major container ports are calculated by the data obtained from the AHP round survey respondents.FindingsAvoiding pollutants during cargo handling and port maintenance, noise control, and sewage treatment were perceived to be the three critical indicators by respondents in two of the three ports investigated. Among the three investigated ports, Shanghai port had the highest number of critical indicators to be improved. Air pollutants avoidance, encouraging the use of low‐sulphur fuel, and using electrically powered equipment were three of the five critical indicators found in Shanghai port, but not in the other two investigated ports in this study.Originality/valueThe theoretical implications of this research are the development of a conceptual framework to measure the degree of importance of a set of green port performance indicators, and to provide a decision support system to help port authorities to evaluate their performance regarding the 17 green port performance indicators compared with that of other ports.

Logistics service providers and corporate social responsibility: sustainability reporting in the logistics industry

“…Environmental issues appear to be the most prominent aspects of CSR discussed in the recent academic publications (Wu and Dunn, 1994, Kovács, 2008, Piecyk and McKinnon, 2010, McKinnon and Piecyk, 2012, Björklund and Forslund, 2013a, Cantor et al, 2013, Lirn et al, 2013, Winter and Knemeyer, 2013. The rise in environmentally responsible logistics operations has been a result of governmental regulations, economic considerations and increasingly strong market signals from environmentally conscious consumers (Goldsby and Stank, 2000, Scholtens and Kleinsmann, 2011, Tacken et al, 2014.…”

Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations

“…Additionally, education and training for sustainability management are gradually becoming a relevant part in courses within business schools of European and American universities [170,171]. Scholars tend to pay increasingly focus on "ill health associated with air and water pollution", "pollution prevention", and "waste management" [171].…”

“…Scholars tend to pay increasingly focus on "ill health associated with air and water pollution", "pollution prevention", and "waste management" [171].…”

Untitled

“…International ports that seek to transform themselves into green ports must first pay attention to pollution risk management in the port area. This study investigated pollution risk factors under the three aspects of air pollution, seawater pollution, and noise pollut ion based on a review of the literature [3,4,7,8,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and collection of recommendations from interviews with experts and scholars. The following Table 1 contains explanations of the assessment criteria obtained by this study.…”