2021
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green patenting and corporate social responsibility: Does family involvement in business matter?

Abstract: This paper explores whether family and non-family firms differ in terms of their capability to introduce green patenting. By considering the environmental performance as a corporate social responsibility related concern, the analysis is based on a large data set of patenting activities carried out by Italian manufacturing firms over the period 2009-2017. Results show that family firms are less likely than non-family firms to implement innovations in green technologies. This holds true whatever the level of acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, family involvement may be detrimental to eco‐innovation, as family firms avoid paradigmatic shifts in using existing assets owing to their affiliation and potential for dilution of their control if investments in new technology must be made (Bendell, 2022). The SEW consideration believes that families are more risk‐averse because innovative processes may compromise family control and thus mitigate SEW; hence, potential family interaction with external stakeholders may compromise the family's control (Aiello et al, 2021). For example, eco‐innovation poses huge risks that require substantial external help (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, family involvement may be detrimental to eco‐innovation, as family firms avoid paradigmatic shifts in using existing assets owing to their affiliation and potential for dilution of their control if investments in new technology must be made (Bendell, 2022). The SEW consideration believes that families are more risk‐averse because innovative processes may compromise family control and thus mitigate SEW; hence, potential family interaction with external stakeholders may compromise the family's control (Aiello et al, 2021). For example, eco‐innovation poses huge risks that require substantial external help (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the success of eco-innovation processes, the family may waive some of their authority and thus compromise SEW (Tan et al, 2021). Empirical evidence supports the negative impact of family involvement on ecoinnovation (Aiello et al, 2021;Tan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2009). More recently, Aiello et al. (2021) argue that FB are less likely than non-FB to implement green innovations and conclude that the role of family participation in green innovation may be more influential than previously believed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, despite growing attention to the study of green innovation, research comparing family and non-FB has often presented contrasting findings (Doluca et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2009;Aiello et al, 2021). Doluca et al (2018) looked into the environmental behavior of family firms in comparison with their non-family counterparts, highlighting that family companies initially show a conservative and less proactive behavior, but over time, the behavior between family and non-FB converges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%