2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5104335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green-Kubo measurement of liquid-solid friction in finite-size systems

Abstract: To characterize liquid-solid friction using molecular dynamics simulations, Bocquet and Barrat (BB) [Phys. Rev. E 49, 3079-3092 (1994)] proposed to use the plateau value of a Green-Kubo (GK) integral of the friction force. The BB method is delicate to apply in finitesize simulations, where the GK integral vanishes at long times. Here, we derive an expression for the GK integral in finite-size systems, based on a Langevin description of a coarse-grained system effectively involving a certain thickness of liquid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24][25] On the modeling side, several efforts have been pursued in order to understand the molecular mechanisms that control friction, with special interest on the discussion of the relation between the friction coefficient and the time autocorrelation of the force exerted by the liquid on the wall. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Further work has been performed to study the impact on friction of different wall features such as wettability, 34,35 roughness, 36 crystallographic orientation, 37 electronic structure, [38][39][40] or electrostatic interactions. 41 Yet a large number of questions with regard to the interface properties, such as its viscoelastic or purely viscous nature [42][43][44] or the possible link with its interfacial thermal transport equivalents via wall's wetting properties, [45][46][47] remain open nowadays, limiting the perspectives for a rational search of optimal interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] On the modeling side, several efforts have been pursued in order to understand the molecular mechanisms that control friction, with special interest on the discussion of the relation between the friction coefficient and the time autocorrelation of the force exerted by the liquid on the wall. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Further work has been performed to study the impact on friction of different wall features such as wettability, 34,35 roughness, 36 crystallographic orientation, 37 electronic structure, [38][39][40] or electrostatic interactions. 41 Yet a large number of questions with regard to the interface properties, such as its viscoelastic or purely viscous nature [42][43][44] or the possible link with its interfacial thermal transport equivalents via wall's wetting properties, [45][46][47] remain open nowadays, limiting the perspectives for a rational search of optimal interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 illustrate the difficulty to obtain the liquid-solid FC through the evaluation of the Green-Kubo integral of the friction force autocorrelation function [3,45] given by equilibrium MD simulations. In the evaluation of the Green-Kubo integral in systems of finite size, it is often assumed that the mass of the fluid involved in the liquid-solid friction is a finite constant [46][47][48], but the present results show that it is actually frequency dependent.…”
Section: A Identification Of the Hydrodynamic Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…where  is the friction coefficient and can be determined from the liquid-graphene interaction (96). S represents the surface area of the nanofiller.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid/solid interface friction is described ( Fig. 6A ) as ( 95 ) where μ is the friction coefficient and can be determined from the liquid-graphene interaction ( 96 ). S represents the surface area of the nanofiller.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%