Abstract:Abstract. Green infrastructure is strategic and spatial approach to landscape and environment planning, applying key principles of landscape ecology to urban environments, and specifically planning in multiscale approach. It is adopted and developed as a result of the opportunities it has provided in various disciplines to meet ecological, environmental, social challenges of landscape planning. Multi use of green infrastructure has the potential of contributing to climate change adaptation in various scales an… Show more
“…During the second decade of this century, water resource management has seen a shift from controlling flood and drought hazards towards managing risk [10] using coping mechanisms, urban adaptation, mitigating exposure and socioeconomic strategies. For instance, rapid drought-flood alternations in Missouri, 2002-2007, and California, 2011-2017, have placed a large amount of stress on water resource management plans [17].…”
Section: Managing Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explaining and quantifying flood and drought issues together represents a complex yet challenging area of research [17] and requires implicating various methods and indices. The literature on analyzing flood and drought issues discusses different perspectives ranging from water resources [18][19][20], to climate change [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], urban and landscape planning [15,28,29], ecology [30][31][32][33] socio-economy [34][35][36], policymaking [37,38], water quality [39,40] and even abrupt alternation/coexistence [41].…”
The severity and frequency of flood and drought events have increased in recent decades. These climate change-induced and anthropogenic stressors on water resources represent the leading water-related hazards to communities. Further, the increasing exposure of the population and infrastructure to such events has heightened the risks. Assessing the impact scope of these events in different subfields towards comprehensively evaluating the risks requires an unbiased systematic approach. This paper combines content analysis and science mapping to investigate the existing multidisciplinary body of knowledge on analyzing flood and drought together. Searching the literature using selected search terms yielded a sample of 119 publications. Initially, various contents, such as the authors’ keywords, applied methods and indices, and study scale, were extracted from these articles. These contents were then incorporated into the science mapping technique to form communicative networks. Analyzing these publications revealed 13 major research themes, with a sustained focus on hydrological issues. However, a more diverse range of themes was recently revealed, including economy, sociology, insurance, and policymaking. Producing such computational and visual networks explained informative insights that can help further develop both existing and new frameworks to support the management, design and policymaking sectors in responding to both flood and drought events.
“…During the second decade of this century, water resource management has seen a shift from controlling flood and drought hazards towards managing risk [10] using coping mechanisms, urban adaptation, mitigating exposure and socioeconomic strategies. For instance, rapid drought-flood alternations in Missouri, 2002-2007, and California, 2011-2017, have placed a large amount of stress on water resource management plans [17].…”
Section: Managing Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explaining and quantifying flood and drought issues together represents a complex yet challenging area of research [17] and requires implicating various methods and indices. The literature on analyzing flood and drought issues discusses different perspectives ranging from water resources [18][19][20], to climate change [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], urban and landscape planning [15,28,29], ecology [30][31][32][33] socio-economy [34][35][36], policymaking [37,38], water quality [39,40] and even abrupt alternation/coexistence [41].…”
The severity and frequency of flood and drought events have increased in recent decades. These climate change-induced and anthropogenic stressors on water resources represent the leading water-related hazards to communities. Further, the increasing exposure of the population and infrastructure to such events has heightened the risks. Assessing the impact scope of these events in different subfields towards comprehensively evaluating the risks requires an unbiased systematic approach. This paper combines content analysis and science mapping to investigate the existing multidisciplinary body of knowledge on analyzing flood and drought together. Searching the literature using selected search terms yielded a sample of 119 publications. Initially, various contents, such as the authors’ keywords, applied methods and indices, and study scale, were extracted from these articles. These contents were then incorporated into the science mapping technique to form communicative networks. Analyzing these publications revealed 13 major research themes, with a sustained focus on hydrological issues. However, a more diverse range of themes was recently revealed, including economy, sociology, insurance, and policymaking. Producing such computational and visual networks explained informative insights that can help further develop both existing and new frameworks to support the management, design and policymaking sectors in responding to both flood and drought events.
“…There is increasing evidence of the benefits that nature provides for human environments [12][13][14][15]. The application of green infrastructure (GI) in urban planning provides the opportunity to design cities and urban areas as living systems that are more connected with nature, creating healthier, resilient and sustainable urban environments [16][17][18][19]. GI and its application in spatial planning is recognized as a successful strategy to support resilience in many cities around the world [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These principles can be combined in diverse ways to respond to particular challenges that different regions may face [24]. In addition, the flexibility and diversity of UGI components allow different combinations to be tailored for different local contexts, spatial levels and issues, resulting in a potential adaptation strategy for planning resilient urban areas [16,17,25]. UGI contributes to the adaptation of urban areas towards the impacts of climate change because of its capacity to: retain, store and reuse water later, reducing stormwater runoff and floods; increase permeable surfaces; regulate local temperature; improve water quality; increase buildings efficiency; and provide new habitats for species [8,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UGI contributes to the adaptation of urban areas towards the impacts of climate change because of its capacity to: retain, store and reuse water later, reducing stormwater runoff and floods; increase permeable surfaces; regulate local temperature; improve water quality; increase buildings efficiency; and provide new habitats for species [8,28]. UGI is a potential tool to be used as an adaptation strategy for planning and designing resilient urban areas to combat the impacts of climate change [16,17].…”
Urban green infrastructure (UGI) has the potential to address a wide range of challenges associated with rapidly growing cities in a changing climate, while also providing multiple environmental, economic and social benefits. However, the location of projects is often determined according to a single potential benefit rather than a set of benefits. Furthermore, while UGI is recognized as a successful strategy to support resilience in many cities around the world, it has not been implemented in Uruguay. This study develops a model to identify priority areas in need of green infrastructure in Montevideo, Uruguay. The GIS-based model, termed the “Green Infrastructure Suitability Model” (GISM) is based on a multi-criteria decision analysis approach and is similar in structure to land suitability analysis. The model considers a range of socioeconomic, biophysical and environmental factors to prioritize the need for UGI across the case-study region. Resulting suitability maps identify areas for multifunctional UGI localization in places where benefits can be maximized. The GISM has potential as a tool to support future planning for multifunctional UGI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.