2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green growth or degrowth? Assessing the normative justifications for environmental sustainability and economic growth through critical social theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sugden integrated these two views, and defined IG as the state in which economic development requires the participation of all the people, who then share its benefits [8]. Overall, IG adheres to the principles of common development of economic growth, fairness and justice, equal opportunities and livelihood, where the production process and results are shared by all the people [26].…”
Section: Definition Of Inclusive Green Growth (Igg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugden integrated these two views, and defined IG as the state in which economic development requires the participation of all the people, who then share its benefits [8]. Overall, IG adheres to the principles of common development of economic growth, fairness and justice, equal opportunities and livelihood, where the production process and results are shared by all the people [26].…”
Section: Definition Of Inclusive Green Growth (Igg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) The most sustainable scenario is, however, to decrease or even reverse global mobility rates of humans and other carriers and vectors, especially if it is part and parcel of a much larger movement towards global sustainability by reducing humanity's environmental footprint and replacing unsustainable economic growth with sustainable economic degrowth (Schneider et al, 2010;Daly and Farley, 2011;Alexander, 2012;Czech, 2013;Galaz, 2014;Cosme et al, 2017;Weiss and Cattaneo, 2017;Chiengkul, 2018;Sandberg et al, 2019;Schmid, 2019). Such a general, comprehensive and global slowdown of mobility of both uninfected and infected people and vectors would be opposed for many reasons and by many interest groups, mainly based on economic arguments based around the need for continuous economic growth which has so far almost always been positively linked with increased mobility (e.g., Arvin et al, 2015;Hakim and Merkert, 2016;UNWTO, 2017;Saidi et al, 2018;Nasreen et al, 2020).…”
Section: General Discussion and Future Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those subscribing to the degrowth agenda argue that, by situating growth in a position central to socio-economic policies, these very policies will result in economic decline due to the finite nature of the Earth (Weiss and Cattaneo 2017). As Sandberg et al (2019) discuss in relation to green growth, the blue economy is unlikely to slow or reverse environmental degradation.…”
Section: From Blue Growth To Blue Degrowthmentioning
confidence: 99%