2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green competitiveness evaluation of provinces in China based on correlation analysis and fuzzy rough set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the resulting index, the GC spectrum was divided into three levels (light green, medium green, and dark green) to explore changes in 30 provinces of China during the period 2004 to 2014. Spatial differences in GC vary from high to low in a westerly direction [ 29 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the resulting index, the GC spectrum was divided into three levels (light green, medium green, and dark green) to explore changes in 30 provinces of China during the period 2004 to 2014. Spatial differences in GC vary from high to low in a westerly direction [ 29 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An information system usually contains multiple reductions. If E is independent, then E is the smallest set that maintains the classification ability of the universe U [25,26].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiau et al [25] successfully used rough set theory to screen factors affecting transportation sustainability in Taiwan. Cheng et al [26] used the rough set theory to select and analyse 21 indicators affecting regional green competitiveness and formulate regional green competitiveness indicators. Ge et al [27] extracted spatial relationship indicators using rough set theory to describe the complex relationship between geographical phenomena and the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation process of the objective weight is presented below [ 68 ]. (1) The correlation coefficient matrix can be established as follows: where r ij ( i , j = 1, 2 … n ) is the correlation coefficient of u i ; u j and r ij can be represented by the following formula: (2) The mean value of the correlation degree of u i is as follows: (3) The greater the correlation of an index, the smaller its importance.…”
Section: Information Fusion and Risk Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%