2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green citrus detection using ‘eigenfruit’, color and circular Gabor texture features under natural outdoor conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods used in this article are rather basic compared with methods used for apple detection, which may elucidate why those authors achieved a better performance. However, for green citrus detection, Kurtulmus et al (2011) achieved a TPR of 75% and a SFPR of 27%, which is comparable to results achieved in this research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The methods used in this article are rather basic compared with methods used for apple detection, which may elucidate why those authors achieved a better performance. However, for green citrus detection, Kurtulmus et al (2011) achieved a TPR of 75% and a SFPR of 27%, which is comparable to results achieved in this research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Granitto et al 2002, Mebatsion et al 2013, fruits (e.g. Kondo et al 2000, Kurtulmus et al 2011, Mollazade et al 2012, Rodríguez-Pulido et al 2012, Payne et al 2013, leaves (e.g. Buschmann andNagel 1993, Buschmann et al 2012) or entire plants or vegetation (e.g.…”
Section: ---mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Numerous studies have used texture analysis in fruit detection methods (Rakun et al, 2011;Zhao et al, 2005;Kurtulmus et al, 2011;Chaivivatrakul and Dailey, 2014). Kurtulmus et al (2011) used Gabor texture analysis proposed by Zhang et al (2002) to segment green citrus from the background.…”
Section: Texture Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%