Green building, split-incentives and affordable rental housing policy

Abstract

We investigate the notion of capitalizing on investments in energy, water and gas efficiency within the context of affordable rental housing subsidy schemes; how associated utility savings offer a means to deliver policy designed to mitigate for issues of split-incentives. An Australian case study representing a typical affordable housing development is analyzed for two scenarios -a 'Business as usual' and 'Green-certified' case. Over a 10-year rental tenancy, operational utility efficiencies, achieved through green building principles are modelled to reduce total housing costs by 1.7-3.8% (AUD $5-18 per week), for one-and four-person households, respectively. Over the building lifecycle, the net present value of improvements are forecasted to be positive, signalling favourable support for policy interventions. The findings provide evidence to support a broader notion of 'housing assistance' to one that includes improved standards on residential utility efficiency. We present three policy options on how to deliver these benefits to stakeholders.

Is there a green premium in the green bond market? Systematic literature review revealing premium determinants

“…As part of corporate ESG reporting criteria, GBs offer synergies with carbon-reporting requirements, which can be more directly associated with efforts to mitigate environmental impacts and climate change. Investors are better able to enact targeted climate change mitigation efforts because GBs are invested in a wide range of environmentally beneficial assets, ranging from solar power generation to 'green' affordable housing (MacAskill et al, 2019). Studies note that voluntary nonfinancial disclosure of proceeds is an important factor in governing market prices for GBs; the pricing benefits often exceed the cost (Baker et al, 2018;Hyun et al, 2019).…”

The role of policy and regulation in promoting green buildings

“…Grants and subsidies help make green building projects more financially feasible for developers, especially in cases where the upfront costs of sustainable features are higher than conventional alternatives (Ibeh, et. al., 2024, MacAskill, et. al., 2021.…”

Financing Options for Green and Affordable Housing (GAH): An Exploratory Study of South Asian Economies

“…The lifetime of an environmentally friendly and energy and resource efficient building, from conception to design, construction, operation, maintenance, restoration, and demolition. [1,3,10,15,17] High Value homes Lowered bills, lowered default rate and higher resale value [3,11,18] Source: Author's compilation from the Literature Survey.…”