2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19214620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greedy Mechanism Based Particle Swarm Optimization for Path Planning Problem of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle

Abstract: Recently, issues of climate change, environment abnormality, individual requirements, and national defense have caused extensive attention to the commercial, scientific, and military development of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs). In order to design high-quality routes for a multi-sensor integrated USV, this work improves the conventional particle swarm optimization algorithm by introducing the greedy mechanism and the 2-opt operation, based on a combination strategy. First, a greedy black box is established … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, three of our PSO or GA-based algorithms are selected for comparison with the MSGPSO: a multi-domain inversionbased GA (MDIGA) [42], an improved PSO with adaptively adjusted acceleration coefficients and inertia weight (AWIPSO) [41], and a greedy strategy-based PSO (GSPSO) (abbreviated as IPSO in [32]). It is worth noting that this study has certain connections and essential differences with the three recently published works.…”
Section: Comparative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, three of our PSO or GA-based algorithms are selected for comparison with the MSGPSO: a multi-domain inversionbased GA (MDIGA) [42], an improved PSO with adaptively adjusted acceleration coefficients and inertia weight (AWIPSO) [41], and a greedy strategy-based PSO (GSPSO) (abbreviated as IPSO in [32]). It is worth noting that this study has certain connections and essential differences with the three recently published works.…”
Section: Comparative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also a criterion to identify the global best-known solution of the entire swarm (Pgs) and the personal best-known solution of each particle (Pjs). Subsequently, the velocity and position of each particle are updated using (2) and (3) [32,33,34].…”
Section: A Pso For the Tspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of an adaptive step length will be further explained later. Based on the test results, the cost function values can be obtained, and the unit gradient vector e k is numerically estimated from the previous two iterations by using Equations (6) and 7.…”
Section: Two-pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable autonomous navigation system with the capabilities of path-planning, obstacle avoidance, and auto-guidance is essential for an USV to deal with various and dynamic marine situations [3]. The most widely used obstacle avoidance and path-planning algorithms include artificial potential fields (APF) [4], rapidly exploring random trees (RRTs) [5], greedy mechanism-based particle swarm optimization (PSO) [6], and grid map-based path-planning algorithms (e.g., A* algorithm [7], Field D* [8], and Theta* [9]). These algorithms focus on path-planning for obstacle avoidance considering the kinematics of the vehicle and the obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is extremely important to find a novel large-scale optimization method to solve these real-world large-scale and complex problems. In recent years, meta-heuristic algorithms have received widespread attention from scholars [5]. The main purpose of the development of meta-heuristic algorithms is to quickly solve path planning problem and get satisfactory solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%