2021
DOI: 10.4114/intartif.vol24iss68pp123-137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greedy Genetic Algorithm for the Data Aggregator Positioning Problem in Smart Grids

Abstract: In this work, we present a metaheuristic based on the genetic and greedy algorithms to solve an application of the set covering problem (SCP), the data aggregator positioning in smart grids. The GGH (Greedy Genetic Hybrid) is structured as a genetic algorithm, but it has many modifications compared to the classic version. At the mutation step, only columns included in the solution can suffer mutation and be removed. At the recombination step, only columns from the parent’s solutions are available to generate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The center vector of the Wifi fingerprint dataset is taken as the Wifi fingerprint without saving the whole dataset, and it is experimentally proven that this method can achieve a correct rate of more than 90% when the acquisition points are separated by a distance of 2 meters [13]. The advantage of using this method is that a large number of Wifi fingerprint datasets can be reduced and the datasets can be saved to mobile terminals, thus enabling offline localization; after the user Wifi list data is sent to the server, the server makes the Wifi fingerprints of the user's location and its vicinity into the client Wifi fingerprint dataset, and the ware requests the fingerprints near the next location to continue offline localization, and Wifi fingerprint localization can be applied to a large number of users positioning methods [14][15].…”
Section: Figure 1 Wifi Fingerprint Localization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The center vector of the Wifi fingerprint dataset is taken as the Wifi fingerprint without saving the whole dataset, and it is experimentally proven that this method can achieve a correct rate of more than 90% when the acquisition points are separated by a distance of 2 meters [13]. The advantage of using this method is that a large number of Wifi fingerprint datasets can be reduced and the datasets can be saved to mobile terminals, thus enabling offline localization; after the user Wifi list data is sent to the server, the server makes the Wifi fingerprints of the user's location and its vicinity into the client Wifi fingerprint dataset, and the ware requests the fingerprints near the next location to continue offline localization, and Wifi fingerprint localization can be applied to a large number of users positioning methods [14][15].…”
Section: Figure 1 Wifi Fingerprint Localization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%