1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61422-2_127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greedily finding a dense subgraph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
153
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 We apply Core, GreedyLD, and ExactLD to every dataset. We use a computer equipped with 3GHz Intel Core i7 and 8GB of RAM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 We apply Core, GreedyLD, and ExactLD to every dataset. We use a computer equipped with 3GHz Intel Core i7 and 8GB of RAM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently best approximation guarantee for the latter problem is O(n −δ ), for some universal constant δ < 1/3, due to Feige, Kortsarz and Peleg [23], superseding an earlier O(n −0.3885 ) factor given by Kortsarz and Peleg [41]. Additional approaches whose performance depends on the ratio k/n have emerged over the years, for example, a greedy heuristic proposed by Asahiro, Iwama, Tamaki and Tokuyama [8], and SDP-based algorithms developed by Feige and Langberg [22] and Han, Ye and Zhang [36]. For the case k = (n), Arora, Karger and Karpinski [6] devised a PTAS in dense graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Until recently, when Bhaskara et al [7] presented an O(n 1/4+ )-approximation algorithm for any > 0, it has been a long-standing open problem whether the factor O(n 1/3 ) can be significantly beaten. Ashahiro et al [8] showed that a simple greedy strategy yields an approximation ratio of O(n/k), and Feige and Langberg [9] showed that n/k is achievable using semidefinite programming. On the other hand, using a random sampling technique, Arora et al [10] presented a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for dense graphs with k = (n), that is, if the number of edges is (n 2 ) and k = (n), then there is an (1 + )-approximation algorithm for any > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%