Greater postexercise hypotension response in low-load and high-volume resistance training versus high-load and low-volume resistance training

Malheiros, R. C.; Nasser, Igor; Willardson, Jeffrey M.; Miranda, Humberto

doi:10.1007/s11332-019-00614-5

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the research by Gotshall et al (1994) suggested that a prolonged seated position may affect HRV changes which can result in venous return and increased baroreflex activity. Optimal positioning for reflecting the autonomic nervous system status of RT also remains to be studied ( Flatt et al, 2019 ; Malheiros et al, 2020 ). Moreover, the interindividual differences in the movement tempo were not controlled.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Post‐Exercise Blood Pressure from Manipulating Rest Intervals Between Sets of Resistance Training

Alemi

Majlesi

Nekooei

et al. 2022

Journal of Human Kinetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to compare blood pressure and heart rate variability responses in physically active men after performing resistance training sessions with rest intervals of 1 min, 2 min and 3 min. Eighteen men (age, 21.6±1.1 years; body mass, 74.1±8.1 kg; body height, 175.3±7.1 cm) who performed 180min of physical activity per week participated in this study. After determining the 15RM loads for the squat, bench press, bent-over row and deadlift, participants performed a resistance training session. Participants performed three resistance training protocols in randomized counterbalanced order. Each experimental protocol comprised different rest intervals between sets of resistance training exercises (1min, 2min or 3min). During each experimental session, participants performed three sets with a 15RM load. Blood pressure and heart rate variability were measured before and for 2h after each session. The results demonstrated a greater blood pressure (p<0.05) reduction with a longer rest interval. There was no statistically significant difference in heart rate variability changes between groups. These results indicate that 2min and 3min rest intervals while using a 15RM load provide the best stimulus for a blood pressure reduction response after a resistance training session. Our findings suggest that strength and conditioning professionals should prescribe 2min or 3min rest intervals when resistance training is performed with a 15RM load if the aim is to obtain an acute reduction in blood pressure after a resistance training session.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Post‐Exercise Blood Pressure from Manipulating Rest Intervals Between Sets of Resistance Training

Alemi

Majlesi

Nekooei

et al. 2022

Journal of Human Kinetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Kinematics of take-off phase in successful and unsuccessful performances of gymnastic somersault: an experimental study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Influence of different training methods on cardiovascular disease risk markers after cessation of anabolic steroids abuse in bodybuilders at risk

Hashemi

Arazi

2021

CEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evidence suggests that anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) abuse induces adverse effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, it is unclear whether different training methods are effective in reducing these consequences. This study aims to compare the effects of aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), and combined training (CT) on CVD risk markers in professional bodybuilders at risk after cessation of AAS abuse. Forty bodybuilders were randomly assigned to one of four groups: control (n=10), AT (n=10), RT (RT, n=10), and CT (n=10) groups. Before and after eight weeks of training, the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), haematocrit (HCT), homocysteine (HCY), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and blood pressure (BP) were measured. Significant decreases within groups in HCY and CRP were observed (P<0.05). However, decreases were greater in training groups, and there was a significant difference between control and training groups (P<0.05). Increase in NT-proBNP, and decreases in systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels were significant only in training groups (P<0.005). The increase of NT-proBNP was significant in the CT when compared to the RT (P<0.05). The present study found that discontinuing AAS consumption can improve some CVD risk markers in professional bodybuilders, but this effect could be improved if various modalities of training were performed. Accompanying AT with RT was also discovered to have a greater impact on some markers (including NT-proBNP).

show abstract

Greater postexercise hypotension response in low-load and high-volume resistance training versus high-load and low-volume resistance training

Cited by 3 publications

References 29 publications

Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Post‐Exercise Blood Pressure from Manipulating Rest Intervals Between Sets of Resistance Training

Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Post‐Exercise Blood Pressure from Manipulating Rest Intervals Between Sets of Resistance Training

Kinematics of take-off phase in successful and unsuccessful performances of gymnastic somersault: an experimental study

Influence of different training methods on cardiovascular disease risk markers after cessation of anabolic steroids abuse in bodybuilders at risk

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About