2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0409-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides a relatively restrictive subset of interactions between SDGs relevant to companies' operations. Country-specific assessments have focussed on 22 Arab countries assessing 'level of urgency', 'systemic impact', and 'policy gaps' (Allen et al 2019a), Australia (Allen et al 2019b), or Sweden (Weitz et al 2018) latter using the seven-point scale (Nilsson et al 2016) in an influence (or cross-impact) matrix, assessed all pairwise interactions between two targets from each SDG (excluding SDG 17). Two targets were selected as being of most relevance for Sweden, and the resulting 34 × 34 impact matrix showed that most interactions (96%) were positive or neutral.…”
Section: Previous Assessments Of Interactions Between Sdgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides a relatively restrictive subset of interactions between SDGs relevant to companies' operations. Country-specific assessments have focussed on 22 Arab countries assessing 'level of urgency', 'systemic impact', and 'policy gaps' (Allen et al 2019a), Australia (Allen et al 2019b), or Sweden (Weitz et al 2018) latter using the seven-point scale (Nilsson et al 2016) in an influence (or cross-impact) matrix, assessed all pairwise interactions between two targets from each SDG (excluding SDG 17). Two targets were selected as being of most relevance for Sweden, and the resulting 34 × 34 impact matrix showed that most interactions (96%) were positive or neutral.…”
Section: Previous Assessments Of Interactions Between Sdgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been studies which extend the SSPs to be regionally relevant (Absar and Preston 2015 ; Frame et al 2018 ; Kok et al 2019 ; Nilsson et al 2017 ; Palazzo et al 2017 ; Reimann, Merkens and Vafeidis 2018 ; Zandersen et al 2019 ), and additionally studies which incorporate SSPs and SDGs at a sub-global scale (Allen et al 2019 ; Gil et al 2019 ; Moyer and Hedden 2020 ), a new approach was needed to address the unique challenges of assessing the achievement of the SDGs (Allen, Metternicht and Wiedmann 2016 , 2017 ), at both global and local scales. By downscaling and linking the SDGs to the existing pathway framework of the SSPs, we have provided a consistent and tested method to generate pathways that can be used with any SDG implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original SSPs are defined in a two-dimensional space based on challenges to climate mitigation and climate adaptation (O’Neill et al 2014 ). However, this conceptual space can be adapted depending on the context (Allen et al ( 2019 ). To define our pathways in the context of the SDGs, we constructed a three-dimensional space with each axis representing one of the three dimensions of the SDGs i.e., people, planet, and prosperity (UN 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations