2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-010-0229-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greater Disruption to Control of Voluntary Saccades in Autistic Disorder than Asperger’s Disorder: Evidence for Greater Cerebellar Involvement in Autism?

Abstract: It remains unclear whether autism and Asperger's disorder (AD) exist on a symptom continuum or are separate disorders with discrete neurobiological underpinnings. In addition to impairments in communication and social cognition, motor deficits constitute a significant clinical feature in both disorders. It has been suggested that motor deficits and in particular the integrity of cerebellar modulation of movement may differentiate these disorders. We used a simple volitional saccade task to comprehensively prof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
29
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
8
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the results show that the surface area of the CoP is smaller during the fixation task, and it increased during pursuits reaching larger values during saccades. This finding could be due to the poor oculomotor performances reported in these kinds of children [34, 35], but it could also be due to the fact that autistic children have difficulty in shifting attention [36]. Consequently, performing a dual-task is very difficult for them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the results show that the surface area of the CoP is smaller during the fixation task, and it increased during pursuits reaching larger values during saccades. This finding could be due to the poor oculomotor performances reported in these kinds of children [34, 35], but it could also be due to the fact that autistic children have difficulty in shifting attention [36]. Consequently, performing a dual-task is very difficult for them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD is currently differentiated from autism by the absence of clinically significant delays in language (single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by age 3 years), and no delays in cognitive development (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). In addition to the core symptoms associated with autism and AD, motor impairments have been consistently reported in these groups (Fournier et al, 2010) impacting postural control (Gepner and Mestre, 2002), fine motor (Cartmill et al, 2009), upper limb (Martineau et al, 2004; Papadopoulos et al, 2012; Rinehart et al, 2006b,c), and ocular motor control (Takarae et al, 2004; Nowinski et al, 2005; Stanley-Cary et al, 2011). Green et al (2002) also found that motor performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, which assesses manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance, was significantly correlated with IQ across children with autism and AD (Green et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the primary site of pathology within the cerebellum is unclear in AD, there is a general consensus the degree of cerebellar disruption is more limited in AD than in autism (Lotspeich et al, 2004; Bauman and Kemper, 2005; Catani et al, 2008; Yu et al, 2011). The cerebellum, in particular vermis lobules VI–VII and the fastigial nuclei, are crucial to the control of eye movements (Ohtsuka and Nodu, 1995; Barash et al, 1999), and several investigations of functional impairment associated with cerebellar abnormalities have used ocular motor paradigms in autism and AD (Takarae et al, 2004; Nowinski et al, 2005; Stanley-Cary et al, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes which disrupt brain tissue may be reflected in the assessment of cognitive processing required for ocular motor function. To this end, ocular motor studies, particularly those including paradigms to evaluate the cognitive processing of sensory input that influences motor output, have demonstrated significant characteristic abnormalities in degenerative diseases (Parkinson's disease,10–14 Huntington's disease14–16), developmental disorders (autism spectrum disorders17) and lesional diseases, such as multiple sclerosis 18–21…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] Processes which disrupt brain tissue may be reflected in the assessment of cognitive processing required for ocular motor function. To this end, ocular motor studies, particularly those including paradigms to evaluate the cognitive processing of sensory input that influences motor output, have demonstrated significant characteristic abnormalities in degenerative diseases (Parkinson's disease, [10][11][12][13][14] Huntington's disease [14][15][16] ), developmental disorders (autism spectrum disorders 17 ) and lesional diseases, such as multiple sclerosis. [18][19][20][21] Cognitive processes, such as attention ( prioritisation of sensory input), inhibitory control (the capacity to delay responses and ignore distraction), working memory, and learning and decision making processes, influence saccadic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%