2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1743921312012665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GRB Prompt X-ray Emission

Abstract: Abstract. I present the observational properties of the prompt emission of supernova associated GRBs (SN-GRBs) focusing on temporal and spectral characteristics. I compare the properties of SN-GRBs with typical long GRBs to see whether there is a distinct difference or not. Furthermore, I present our attempt to search for hard X-ray emission prior to the discovery date from optically identified type Ibc supernovae using Swift BAT survey data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No source was seen in the UVOT observations, but a bright point source was found with the XRT (7). Unlike any previously observed long-GRBs (which typically decline substantially on a time scale of minutes), Sw 1644+57 remained bright and highly variable for a prolonged period and went on to retrigger the BAT on three further occasions over the next 48 hours (8). Reexamination of previous g-ray observations of this region showed that the source appears to have been present a few days before the initial trigger but not at earlier times (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…No source was seen in the UVOT observations, but a bright point source was found with the XRT (7). Unlike any previously observed long-GRBs (which typically decline substantially on a time scale of minutes), Sw 1644+57 remained bright and highly variable for a prolonged period and went on to retrigger the BAT on three further occasions over the next 48 hours (8). Reexamination of previous g-ray observations of this region showed that the source appears to have been present a few days before the initial trigger but not at earlier times (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%