Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing Preferences and Vegetation Feedbacks of the Fire-Grazing Interaction in the Northern Great Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be the case of A. purpusii, for which burning would appear to have influenced growth more than with other species, homogenizing the vegetation along the way. Previous studies in other grasslands in the northern hemisphere have reported that cattle show significant preference for recently burned patches, and this preference declines with time [36,37]. The same trend was observed for tropical savannas with pines, where fire suppression management is implemented using cattle grazing to reduce fire risk [38].…”
Section: Vascular Plant Assemblages Before and After Burningmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This could be the case of A. purpusii, for which burning would appear to have influenced growth more than with other species, homogenizing the vegetation along the way. Previous studies in other grasslands in the northern hemisphere have reported that cattle show significant preference for recently burned patches, and this preference declines with time [36,37]. The same trend was observed for tropical savannas with pines, where fire suppression management is implemented using cattle grazing to reduce fire risk [38].…”
Section: Vascular Plant Assemblages Before and After Burningmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Our prior study included 1 year of pretreatment data for the newly established grazing experiment, one postburn year (2004, 2 years after burning and 2 years after the study was established), and one 5‐year recovery year (2007). Cattle preference, use, and grazing utilization in recently burned patches decline as time since fire increases (Allred et al, 2011; Powell et al, 2018). Thus, it may be more likely to detect a fire and grazing interaction 1–2 years after burning compared with 5 years after burning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better understanding of cattle grazing and fire interactions in dry forests is critical because growing wildfire risks have prompted increased use of intentional burning or prescribed fire to reduce fuel loads and wildfire impacts, and achieve other ecological restoration goals (McWethy et al, 2019; North et al, 2021; Prichard et al, 2021; Stephens et al, 2020; USDA, Forest Service, 2022). Despite widespread cattle grazing in forested rangelands, manipulative fire and grazing studies in the west outside of nonforested areas are rare (Pekin et al, 2015; Powell et al, 2018; Royo et al, 2010; Wisdom et al, 2006; Zimmerman & Neuenschwander, 1984). We investigated the understory vegetation response to cyclical fall and spring prescribed fire and cattle grazing exclusion in ponderosa pine ( Pinus ponderosa ) forest stands and report long‐term responses 12–18 years after the first entry fires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tallgrass prairies, with grass higher than 200 cm, occupy the wetter eastern region. The biophysical settings affect the disturbance regimes of fire and grazing, and human activities influence the development and maintenance of the grassland ecosystems of the Great Plains region [16,17].…”
Section: Woody Encroachment In the Great Plains Of North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%