2016
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing intensity and driving factors affect soil nitrous oxide fluxes during the growing seasons in the Hulunber meadow steppe of China

Abstract: In this study, the effects of cattle grazing intensity on soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes were examined in the Hulunber meadow steppe of north-eastern China. Six stocking-rate treatments (0, 0.23, 0.34, 0.46, 0.69, and 0.92 AU ha −1 ) with three replicates were established, and observations were conducted from 2010 to 2014. Our results showed that substantial temporal fluctuations in N 2 O flux occurred amongst the different grazing intensities, with peak N 2 O fluxes after natural rainfall. Grazing had a lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(40 reference statements)
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during grazing seasons with normal precipitation or dry conditions this affect was not evident, indicating that the grazing intensity and precipitation (soil moisture) interact to effect N 2 O emissions from this grazed rough fescue grassland soil. Our results are both in agreement and in contrast to previous studies, with some showing grazing may increase (Luo et al, ; Frank et al, ; Saggar et al, ) or decrease N 2 O emissions (Wang et al, ; Xu et al, ; Liu et al, ; Peng et al, ; Yan et al, ). We attribute this to the three‐year study period providing a range of annual precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, during grazing seasons with normal precipitation or dry conditions this affect was not evident, indicating that the grazing intensity and precipitation (soil moisture) interact to effect N 2 O emissions from this grazed rough fescue grassland soil. Our results are both in agreement and in contrast to previous studies, with some showing grazing may increase (Luo et al, ; Frank et al, ; Saggar et al, ) or decrease N 2 O emissions (Wang et al, ; Xu et al, ; Liu et al, ; Peng et al, ; Yan et al, ). We attribute this to the three‐year study period providing a range of annual precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The soil N 2 O flux from the rough fescue grassland was highly variable over the grazing season. Grazing by cattle may reduce soil N 2 O flux (Wang et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2010;Peng et al, 2011;Yan et al, 2016), or increase soil N 2 O flux (Luo et al, 1999;Frank et al, 2000;Saggar et al, 2004). The contradictory findings suggest that soil N 2 O emissions under grazing conditions are complex and affected by factors other than cattle stocking rate, probably interactions between soil moisture (O 2 availability) and other soil properties (Chapus-Lardy et al, 2007).…”
Section: Trace Gas Fluxes Over the Grazing Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hulunber meadow steppe is one of the largest natural grasslands in the world and accounts for approximately 60% of the total temperate meadow steppe area in China [25,26]. The Hulunber grassland provides much high-quality forage for livestock and is a fundamental source of livelihood for local residents, in addition to providing various ecological services at regional and national scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hulunber grassland provides much high-quality forage for livestock and is a fundamental source of livelihood for local residents, in addition to providing various ecological services at regional and national scales. However, long-term, high-intensity grazing has resulted in serious degradation of the Hulunber grasslands [25]. In recent years, much effort has been directed to the restoration and sustainable management of the Hulunber grasslands, including fencing to exclude grazers, retiring of livestock, and returning farmlands to grasslands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mowed grassland, the predicted LAI values were greater than 1 m 2 /m 2 on all six experimental dates. The five models exhibited a similar performance throughout the season but greater uncertainty was observed in the late-middle and end stages of the growing season (28 July 2014 and 10 August 2015), possibly resulting from an increasing amount of litter in the grassland [68,69]. After this time, grass cutting activity reduced the proportion of canopy litter, and the prediction uncertainty decreased on 26 August 2015.…”
Section: Model Performance In Different Grassland Types and At Differmentioning
confidence: 99%