2017
DOI: 10.1002/eco.1850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing increases evapotranspiration without the cost of lowering soil water storages in arid ecosystems

Abstract: Grazing is the predominant land use practice in arid environments; however, there are relatively few studies of grazing effects on ecosystem functioning. We assessed the impact of grazing on soil moisture, evapotranspiration (ET), canopy conductance (Gc), and root water uptake in the Patagonian steppe. Studies were done in 3 sites along a gradient of grazing intensity. High grazing intensity increased the soil water storage by 24% and decreased the amount of water extracted from deep layers compared to the low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in soil water availability during the dry season affects several physiological processes, leading to plant dehydration and a substantial loss of root functionality in this ecosystem (Bucci et al., 2013; Scholz et al., 2012). This was also reflected in a decrease in plant transpiration during the drought period (Pereyra et al., 2017), and hence a decrease in CO 2 capture. Furthermore, at low soil moisture conditions, decomposition is limited by soluble C availability (Davidson et al., 2012; Linn & Doran, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in soil water availability during the dry season affects several physiological processes, leading to plant dehydration and a substantial loss of root functionality in this ecosystem (Bucci et al., 2013; Scholz et al., 2012). This was also reflected in a decrease in plant transpiration during the drought period (Pereyra et al., 2017), and hence a decrease in CO 2 capture. Furthermore, at low soil moisture conditions, decomposition is limited by soluble C availability (Davidson et al., 2012; Linn & Doran, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in underground biomass with N and P addition has been previously reported in other ecosystems (Li et al 2015;Huang et al 2018). It should be noted that we only evaluated the effects of the treatments on root biomass in the rst 10 cm depth, but in this ecosystem more than 40% of roots are found in this soil layer and less than 20% at 50 cm depth (Pereyra et al 2017). Moreover, the ne roots located in the upper part of the soil pro le have higher rates of respiration than larger roots or the few roots located deeper in the soil (Pregitzer et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por último, el 8% de los estudios evaluó la tasa de descomposición radical (Tabla 1). Si bien la estimación de la BS parece ser la principal variable de estudio, es necesario obtener otras variables complementarias que permitan determinar cómo las plantas responden a distintos factores ambientales en diferentes ecosistemas y cuál es la profundidad de enraizamiento o la de captación de agua por parte de las raíces (Bucci et al 2009;Pereyra et al 2017).…”
Section: Principales Variables Evaluadasunclassified