Grazing exclusion reduces below‐ground biomass of temperate subhumid grasslands of South America: A meta‐analysis and a database

Abstract

There are several plant below‐ground biomass databases for grasslands, but the contribution from the southern hemisphere is minimal. Particularly, no study has compiled the published values of plant below‐ground biomass for the temperate subhumid grasslands of South America. In these grasslands, called Río de la Plata grasslands, grazing is the most frequent disturbance. We set two objectives: (1) to compile and synthesize data of four variables: below‐ground biomass, fraction of total biomass allocated below‐ground, below‐ground net primary productivity and below‐ground biomass turnover rate; (2) to estimate the effect of grazing exclusion on below‐ground biomass by means of a meta‐analysis. There are 15 studies published on six out of eight regional sub‐divisions of the Río de la Plata grasslands. The most evaluated variable was below‐ground biomass, followed by below‐ground net primary productivity, while the other two variables were scarcely registered. Below‐ground biomass in the shallow portion of the soil (0–10 cm) was on average 877 g m−2. Below‐ground net primary productivity resulted in an average of 245 g m−2 year−1 (estimated using the ingrowth core method) or 560 g m−2 year−1 (core method). The fraction of total biomass allocated below‐ground was on average 0.75. Below‐ground biomass turnover rate presented an average of 2.5 years. On average, the effect of grazing exclusion on below‐ground biomass depended on exclusion time. When exclusion time was shorter than or equal to 3 years, grazing exclusion did not affect below‐ground biomass. In contrast, when exclusion time was longer than 3 years, grazing exclusion reduced below‐ground biomass by 62% (0–10 cm depth) and by 40% (total depth). Excluding South American grasslands from the global databases may introduce some biases in the observed patterns.

Challenges, Roadmaps and Smart Energy Transition towards 100% Renewable Energy Markets in American Islands: A Review

“…Biomass is a heterogeneous source of energy since it can appear in various forms: forestry (cleaning of mountains and river basins), agricultural waste (stubble), or agri-food (waste from the livestock industry or industrial oil) [107]. In this sense, America has large green areas thanks to the watersheds that bathe the continent [108]. For its part, at the island level, the conditions surrounded by water preserve the vegetation and can be very useful since much of it must be harvested and properly treated to produce energy.…”

Comment on: “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence

“…Several local studies on paired grazed and ungrazed native grasslands have previously showed important changes in SOC stocks that varied according to soil types (Piñeiro et al, 2009(Piñeiro et al, , 2010. More recent studies showed that belowground C inputs are heavily impacted by the grazing condition (grazed-135 ungrazed) (López-Mársico et al, 2023). It is surprising that Säumel et al, ignored the well documented differences among native grazed or ungrazed grasslands: its species composition and vegetation structure.…”

Comment on: “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence

“…Several local studies on paired grazed and ungrazed native grasslands have previously showed important changes in SOC stocks that varied according to soil types (Piñeiro et al, 2009(Piñeiro et al, , 2010. More recent studies showed that belowground C inputs are heavily impacted by the grazing condition (grazedungrazed) (López-Mársico et al, 2023). It is surprising that Säumel et al, ignored the well documented differences among native grazed or ungrazed grasslands: its species composition and vegetation structure.…”