2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.664154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing by the Copepod Parvocalanus crassirostris on Picochlorum sp. at Harmful Bloom Densities and the Role of Particle Size

Abstract: Harmful blooms of nanophytoplankton (2–20 μm) are increasingly common and sometimes severe, but requirements and controls of such blooms (e.g., water quality constraints, requirements for nutrients, and the presence of different guilds of grazers) are poorly understood. Laboratory grazing experiments were conducted to evaluate the potential for top-down control by the copepod Parvocalanus crassirostris on a small harmful algal species (an unidentified chlorophyte Picochlorum, 1–4 μm) and to test the effects of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copepoda typically preferred phytoplankton that were nutritious and within a suitable size range (Liu et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2012;Fridolfsson et al, 2019). Picochlorum has been reported to be too small for Copepoda to graze effectively, making top-down control of their bloom less likely (Ma et al, 2021). Thus, our study suggests that B vitamin-induced changes in phytoplankton community composition may also negatively affect Copepoda through feeding inhibition.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Effects On Copepoda and Potential Underlying M...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Copepoda typically preferred phytoplankton that were nutritious and within a suitable size range (Liu et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2012;Fridolfsson et al, 2019). Picochlorum has been reported to be too small for Copepoda to graze effectively, making top-down control of their bloom less likely (Ma et al, 2021). Thus, our study suggests that B vitamin-induced changes in phytoplankton community composition may also negatively affect Copepoda through feeding inhibition.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Effects On Copepoda and Potential Underlying M...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is plausible that during days 14-20 the bacterial, as well as P. wilhelmii, secondary toxic metabolites accumulate in the medium shadowing the toxicity reduction effect (Costelli, 2014). Although there is no record of P. wilhelmii being able to synthesize toxic metabolites, some strains of the Picochlorum genus were reported to have been avoided by copepods as a food source (Ma et al, 2021), or to express cytotoxic activity against cancer cell line (Abolhasani et al, 2018). Since P. wilhelmii has been shown as promising strain for cultivation and isolation of valuable bioproducts, a deeper insight into the toxicity aspects is needed, particularly in a light of the adverse Microtox ® results presented herein, as well as literature reports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%