2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing Altered the Pattern of Woody Plants and Shrub Encroachment in a Temperate Savanna Ecosystem

Abstract: Ulmus pumila-dominated temperate savanna is an important tree-grass complex ecosystem in the Otindag sand land, northern China. To date, few investigations have been undertaken on the spatial patterns and structure of this ecosystem and its driving factors under different grazing pressures. The objective of our study therefore is to explore whether grazing has affected the population structure/pattern of woody plants and shrub encroachment in a temperate savanna ecosystem. Results indicate that species richnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This deduction can also be indirectly supported by the small amount and high variability of the annual precipitation in this area, which is typically 200-350 mm [37,38]. Drought has been increasing continuously in this area since 1960, and the most severe drought in recorded history in this area occurred during 1999-2011 [51]. In addition, U. pumila seedlings often suffer from severe water stress during dry summers that is caused by repeated cycles of drying in the upper soil layers [52].…”
Section: Spatial Patterns Of U Pumila Trees and Their Mechanism Of Fmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This deduction can also be indirectly supported by the small amount and high variability of the annual precipitation in this area, which is typically 200-350 mm [37,38]. Drought has been increasing continuously in this area since 1960, and the most severe drought in recorded history in this area occurred during 1999-2011 [51]. In addition, U. pumila seedlings often suffer from severe water stress during dry summers that is caused by repeated cycles of drying in the upper soil layers [52].…”
Section: Spatial Patterns Of U Pumila Trees and Their Mechanism Of Fmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This situation is likely due to the influence of grazing. Historically, the U. pumila-dominated savanna-like ecosystem of the Otindag Sand Land was an important pasture source, providing a large amount of forage for livestock [51,56]. Although precipitation and soil moisture have been the main limiting factors affecting population regeneration of woody plants in arid and semiarid areas [57], grazing has become an important factor affecting population regeneration; long-term continuous heavy grazing has resulted in the destruction of topsoil and degradation of the rangeland [58].…”
Section: Spatial Interactions Among Trees and Shrubs-old U Pumila Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, shrubs provide hedges for animals, causing livestock to aggregate and walk in the matrix, thereby increasing microbial inputs outside of canopies. In more harsh habitats, shrubs provide shade for animals (Zhang et al, 2019). Moreover, the impact of large farm animals (cattle, sheep, camels, and horses) on shrubs and soil microorganisms differs from that of small 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1038805 animals (wild chickens, lizards, ants, and beetles) (Liu et al, 2015;Stanton et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of these alien species, the general greening observed can be associated to desertification processes linked to changes in species composition and shrub encroachment [75][76][77]. The pauperization of native-species is an indicator of weak health [8] in the ecosystem, caused by the reduction of species richness and by the decrease of woody plants in favor of bush and shrub [76,78,79]. Biodiversity reduction causes the loss of different ecosystem services and, thus, is considered a form of land degradation [2,80,81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%