2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity wave momentum fluxes in the MLT—Part I: Seasonal variation at Collm (51.3°N, 13.0°E)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
7
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The summer maximum is dominated by wind variances caused by short-period GWs as derived from meteor radar observations [Beldon and Mitchell, 2009;Placke et al, 2011]. The experimentally determined seasonal dependence of the GW activity on the zonal background winds was based on data from one particular year and agrees qualitatively with the zonal mean model results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The summer maximum is dominated by wind variances caused by short-period GWs as derived from meteor radar observations [Beldon and Mitchell, 2009;Placke et al, 2011]. The experimentally determined seasonal dependence of the GW activity on the zonal background winds was based on data from one particular year and agrees qualitatively with the zonal mean model results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Owing to the small horizontal phase speeds of GWs, which is of the order of the background mean flow, GWs are very sensitive to background wind filtering in the middle atmosphere (Placke et al 2011a). In general a GW can propagate only against the wind; otherwise it would have encountered a critical level in the mesosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon 2-hourly means, GW variances and fluxes are obtained according to Hocking (2005) by projecting the 2-hourly mean GW fluxes in a 3 km height gate to the radial direction of the respective meteor, and minimizing the difference between projected and measured meteor trail drift variances. Details can be found in Placke et al (2011). The data are averaged to obtain 3-monthly means for each height gate under consideration.…”
Section: Collm Meteor Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%