Gravity Venous Drainage and the 3/8-Inch Venous Line: What Would Poiseuille Do?

Abstract

The 1/2″ venous line has long been the drainage tubing diameter of choice for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, several programs use a smaller diameter venous line when used in conjunction with kinetic-assisted venous drainage or vacuum-assisted venous drainage. In 2014, our perfusion team made an institution-wide effort to miniaturize the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit for children. One of our changes was the transition to a 3/8″ diameter venous line for drainage, even in our larger patients (up to 80 kg). We reviewed the current literature on this topic and delineated the various parameters required to be able to use the 3/8″ venous line with gravity drainage with the aim of using it on patients up to 115 kg with the appropriate venous reservoir. We have successfully used the 3/8″ venous line in more than 40 of our larger patients (35–90 kg) without the need for assisted venous drainage. We were able to reduce CPB prime from 625 ± 118 to 425 ± 52 mL before retrograde autologous priming (RAP)/venous autologous priming (VAP). The prime was further reduced to 325 ± 66 mL after RAP/VAP. Homologous blood utilization was reduced from 217 ± 311 mL to 27 ± 77 mL. Both results were statistically significant. We hypothesize that taking into account two of the parameters of Poiseuille’s law, namely length and diameter, it is possible to safely drain large children and mid-size adults via gravity venous drainage and the 3/8″ venous line. This technique allows reducing prime volume, simplifies CPB circuits with increased safety and potentially reduces the need for homologous blood transfusion.

Extracorporeal Circulation and Venous Hemodynamics: A Literature Review on Physiological Foundations to Clinical Applications

“…A study effectively demonstrated this principle by reducing priming volume, transitioning from a ½" to a 3/8" venous line, and compensating for the diameter reduction by shortening the tube's length, thereby maintaining optimal venous drainage. Given that blood viscosity typically remains within physiological limits during bypass, finetuning the diameter and length of the tubing can optimize venous return in a bypass circuit [8,9].…”