1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00392726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity perception in decapped roots of Zea mays

Abstract: Time-lapse photography and light microscopy were used to determine whether or not sedimentation of the newly developed amyloplasts in the apex of Zea mays L. roots occurred at the time when geotropic responsiveness reappears following removal of the cap. All decapped roots exhibiting a geotropic response had some amyloplast sedimentation in the apical cortical cells. Exposing decapped roots to a centrifugal acceleration of 25 g for 4 h showed that amyloplasts of a similar size and development were not displace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been speculated that the amyloplast statoliths act in the statocyte, i.e. the graviperceptive cell, by pressing upon the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or interact chemically or electrically with the lateral plasmalemma in the horizontally stimulated position (Perbal and Rivi6re 1976;Volkmann and Sievers 1979;Hillman and Wilkins 1982;Sack et al 1984;Wendt and Sievers 1986). Direct contact between the ER and the amyloplasts has not been observed in the root statocyte (Iversen 1974;Moore and McClelen 1985;Stephenson and Hawes 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been speculated that the amyloplast statoliths act in the statocyte, i.e. the graviperceptive cell, by pressing upon the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or interact chemically or electrically with the lateral plasmalemma in the horizontally stimulated position (Perbal and Rivi6re 1976;Volkmann and Sievers 1979;Hillman and Wilkins 1982;Sack et al 1984;Wendt and Sievers 1986). Direct contact between the ER and the amyloplasts has not been observed in the root statocyte (Iversen 1974;Moore and McClelen 1985;Stephenson and Hawes 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Root caps are highly dynamic structures, able to regrow and redifferentiate rapidly when removed or sloughed off as border cells (13,14). Roots sense and respond to gravity by reorienting growth, and the root cap is the site of graviperception (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Roots also respond to other environmental stimuli, such as light, touch, and water, and there is evidence that the sensing mechanisms for some of these stimuli also reside in root caps (20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the numerous studies of root graviresponsiveness of Ig (4,(7)(8)(9)(10)13) is the absence of reliable data for the influence of gravity on the structure of amyloplasts and columella cells. This absence of data is understandable, however, since (a) such investigations require growing controls in microgravity, and (b) clinostats have been shown to be of dubious value for mimicking microgravity (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(c) Removal of amyloplast starch from columella cells abolishes root graviresponsiveness (6). (d) Decapped roots are not graviresponsive (4,7). The resumption of graviresponsiveness by these roots correlates positively with the differentiation and sedimentation of amyloplasts in cells of their tips (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation