2011
DOI: 10.1038/nature09935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity modes as a way to distinguish between hydrogen- and helium-burning red giant stars

Abstract: Red giants are evolved stars that have exhausted the supply of hydrogen in their cores and instead burn hydrogen in a surrounding shell 1,2 . Once a red giant is sufficiently evolved, the helium in the core also undergoes fusion 3 . Outstanding issues in our understanding of red giants include uncertainties in the amount of mass lost at the surface before helium ignition and the amount of internal mixing from rotation and other processes 4 . Progress is hampered by our inability to distinguish between red gian… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
621
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 565 publications
(642 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
20
621
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models with a large density contrast show a frequency difference between consecutive modes that is much smaller than for models at the bottom of the RGB or in the He-B phase. These properties have been measured by Bedding et al (2011) in the spectra of red giants observed by Kepler and also in those of CoRoT red giants (Mosser et al, 2011a). At a given ∆ ν (that of the red clump) the difference of period (∆ P) between consecutive modes gathers the stars in two groups: one characterized by targets with ∆ P > 100 s and one with ∆ P < 60 s. The comparison with theoretical computations allows us to identify these two groups with stars that are burning He at the center, for the first group, and with stars that are still burning H in a shell during the ascending RGB for the second one, and then to lift the degeneracy between RGB and He-B models with the same ∆ ν and ν max .…”
Section: Deviation From Asymptotic Approximation: Evolutionary Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models with a large density contrast show a frequency difference between consecutive modes that is much smaller than for models at the bottom of the RGB or in the He-B phase. These properties have been measured by Bedding et al (2011) in the spectra of red giants observed by Kepler and also in those of CoRoT red giants (Mosser et al, 2011a). At a given ∆ ν (that of the red clump) the difference of period (∆ P) between consecutive modes gathers the stars in two groups: one characterized by targets with ∆ P > 100 s and one with ∆ P < 60 s. The comparison with theoretical computations allows us to identify these two groups with stars that are burning He at the center, for the first group, and with stars that are still burning H in a shell during the ascending RGB for the second one, and then to lift the degeneracy between RGB and He-B models with the same ∆ ν and ν max .…”
Section: Deviation From Asymptotic Approximation: Evolutionary Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about the angular-momentum distribution is inaccessible to direct observations, but it can be extracted from the effect of rotation on oscillation modes that probe the stellar interior. Here we report an increasing rotation rate from the surface of the star to the stellar core in the interiors of red giants, obtained using the rotational frequency splitting of recently detected 'mixed modes' 3,4 . By comparison with theoretical stellar models, we conclude that the core must rotate at least ten times faster than the surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the most exciting recent results is the ability of Kepler to distinguish between giant stars that are still burning hydrogen in a shell surrounding the accumulating helium core, and those giants that have initiated helium burning in the core. 43 Finally, the Kepler data are also being used to study a wide variety of oscillating and pulsating stars, including RR Lyr stars, which can more than double their brightness every 12 hours, as well as cataclysmic variable stars.…”
Section: Key Science Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%