2016
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity currents propagating into ambients with arbitrary shear and density stratification: vorticity‐based modelling

Abstract: We develop a vorticity-based approach for modelling quasi-steady, supercritical gravity currents propagating into a finite-height channel with arbitrary density and velocity stratification. The model enforces the conservation of mass, horizontal and vertical momentum. In contrast to previous approaches, it does not rely on empirical, energybased closure assumptions. Instead, the effective energy loss of the flow can be calculated a posteriori. The present model results in the formulation of a second-order, non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Shin, Dalziel & Linden 2004;Cantero et al 2007;Ooi, Constantinescu & Weber 2009) or stably stratified (e.g. Birman & Meiburg 2007;Venayagamoorthy & Fringer 2007;Nicholson & Flynn 2015;Nasr-Azadani & Meiburg 2016). During the advancement of a gravity current, it may be subject to the influences of bottom roughness/submerged canopies consisting of distributed drag elements that occupy a portion of the flow depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shin, Dalziel & Linden 2004;Cantero et al 2007;Ooi, Constantinescu & Weber 2009) or stably stratified (e.g. Birman & Meiburg 2007;Venayagamoorthy & Fringer 2007;Nicholson & Flynn 2015;Nasr-Azadani & Meiburg 2016). During the advancement of a gravity current, it may be subject to the influences of bottom roughness/submerged canopies consisting of distributed drag elements that occupy a portion of the flow depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of analytical models of downburst outflows has been proposed over the years. These models can be categorized into 1) gravity-current (von Kármán 1940;Benjamin 1968;Bryan and Rotunno 2008;Hogg et al 2016;Nasr-Azadani and Meiburg 2016), 2) semiempirical (e.g., impinging-jetlike) (Oseguera and Bowles 1988;Vicroy 1991;Chay et al 2006;Xhelaj et al 2020), and 3) ring-vortex models (Zhu and Etkin 1985;Ivan 1986;Schultz 1990). A recent review of the analytical formulations in the latter two categories is provided in Romanic and Hangan (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s*() used the vorticity formulation to model the phenomenon of cold pools in shear flows. Xu and Moncrieff () also recognized the “importance of vorticity dynamics for the local flow in the vicinity of a density current.” Furthermore, Nasr‐Azadani and Meiburg () have developed a vorticity‐based model of quasi‐steady and supercritical ( Fr > 1) gravity currents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%